Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
2015
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169737161006 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
Sommario:
- Inspiratory muscle training with threshold or incentive spirometry: Which is the most effective? Dulciane Nunes Paiva Laíse Bender Assmann Diogo Fanfa Bordin Ricardo Gass Renan Trevisan Jost Mario Bernardo-Filho Rodrigo Alves Franca Dannuey Machado Cardoso Medicina Incentive spirometry Maximal inspiratory pressure Inspiratory muscular training Inspiratory muscular training (IMT) increases the respiratory muscle strength, how- ever, there is no data demonstrating its superiority over the incentive spirometry (IS) in doing so. Values of muscle strength after IMT (Threshold IMT ® ) and by the IS (Voldyne ® ) in healthy females was compared. Subjects ( n = 40) were randomly divided into control group (CG, n = 14), IS group (ISG, n = 13) and threshold group (TG, n = 13). PI max was measured before (pre-IMT), at 15 and 30 days of IMT. There was an increase in PI max of the TG at 15 days ( p < 0.001) and 30 days of IMT ( p < 0.001). The same occurred with the ISG, which increased the PI max at 15 days ( p < 0.001) and 30 days of training ( p < 0.001). After 30 days of IMT, the TG presented a PI max which was sig- nificantly higher than ISG and the CG ( p = 0.045 and p < 0.001, respectively). It can be concluded that IMT by threshold was more effective in increasing muscle strength than the Voldyne. 2015 artículo científico 0873-2159 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169737161006 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=1697 Revista Portuguesa de Pneumología application/pdf Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia Revista Portuguesa de Pneumología (Portugal) Num.2 Vol.21