Reply to Comment of Finger et al. (2013) on: ‘Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications’ of Gutiérrez et al. (2013, Andean Geology 40 (1): 66-78)

Documents similaires

• Reply to Comment of Encinas et al. (2014) on: ‘Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, climatic and tectonic implications’ of Gutiérrez et al. (2013, Andean Geology 40 (1): 66-78)
  par: Jacobus P. Le Roux
  Publié: (2014)
• Comment on Reply to Comment of Finger et al. (2013) on: ‘Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications’ of Gutiérrez et al. (2013, Andean Geology 40 (1): 66-78)
  par: Alfonso Encinas
  Publié: (2014)
• Comment on ‘Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications’ of Gutiérrez et al. (2013, Andean Geology 40 (1): 66-78)
  par: Kenneth L. Finger
  Publié: (2013)
• Evidence for an Early-Middle Miocene age of the Navidad Formation (central Chile): Paleontological, paleoclimatic and tectonic implications
  par: Néstor M. Gutiérrez
  Publié: (2013)
• Reply to the Comment by Zhang et al
  par: Bogdan Bjelica
  Publié: (2026)