El amparo constitucional contra los actos de la administración del Estado en Iberoamérica: un análisis comparado con el recurso de protección chileno

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juan Carlos Ferrada Bórquez
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad de Talca 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866555728262594560
author Juan Carlos Ferrada Bórquez
author_facet Juan Carlos Ferrada Bórquez
contents El amparo constitucional contra los actos de la administración del Estado en Iberoamérica: un análisis comparado con el recurso de protección chileno Juan Carlos Ferrada Bórquez Andrés Bordalí Salamanca Kamel Cazor Aliste Derecho Constitutional rights Cctions under administrative law Procedures to protect constitutional rights This article offers a comparative study of the Chilean recourse aboutviolation of constitutional rights and their equivalents in the Mexican,Argentine and Spanish constitutional systems, with particularreference to the complaints against the administrative decisions. Aftera general overview of these judicial procedures, the article proceeds toanalyze the legal cases for which the recourse is granted, and thetypes of administrative decisions subject to this control. Next, westudy the different kinds of petitions available to complainants. Finally,procedural matters are analyzed in more detail. A distinction isproposed between these constitutional recourses and the ordinarycontrol procedures against administrative decisions, and theirrelationships, and conceptual differences, are explored in light ofComparative Law 2004 artículo científico 0718-0012 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=19710206 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=197 Revista Ius et Praxis application/pdf Universidad de Talca Revista Ius et Praxis (Chile) Num.2 Vol.10
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_19710206
language en
publishDate 2004
publisher Universidad de Talca
spellingShingle El amparo constitucional contra los actos de la administración del Estado en Iberoamérica: un análisis comparado con el recurso de protección chileno
Juan Carlos Ferrada Bórquez
Derecho
Constitutional rights
Cctions under administrative law
Procedures to protect constitutional rights
El amparo constitucional contra los actos de la administración del Estado en Iberoamérica: un análisis comparado con el recurso de protección chileno Juan Carlos Ferrada Bórquez Andrés Bordalí Salamanca Kamel Cazor Aliste Derecho Constitutional rights Cctions under administrative law Procedures to protect constitutional rights This article offers a comparative study of the Chilean recourse aboutviolation of constitutional rights and their equivalents in the Mexican,Argentine and Spanish constitutional systems, with particularreference to the complaints against the administrative decisions. Aftera general overview of these judicial procedures, the article proceeds toanalyze the legal cases for which the recourse is granted, and thetypes of administrative decisions subject to this control. Next, westudy the different kinds of petitions available to complainants. Finally,procedural matters are analyzed in more detail. A distinction isproposed between these constitutional recourses and the ordinarycontrol procedures against administrative decisions, and theirrelationships, and conceptual differences, are explored in light ofComparative Law 2004 artículo científico 0718-0012 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=19710206 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=197 Revista Ius et Praxis application/pdf Universidad de Talca Revista Ius et Praxis (Chile) Num.2 Vol.10
title El amparo constitucional contra los actos de la administración del Estado en Iberoamérica: un análisis comparado con el recurso de protección chileno
topic Derecho
Constitutional rights
Cctions under administrative law
Procedures to protect constitutional rights
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=19710206