Sophistry And Philosophy: Two Approaches To Teaching Learning

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sean Sturm
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad de Salamanca 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876450578256625664
author Sean Sturm
author_facet Sean Sturm
contents Sophistry And Philosophy: Two Approaches To Teaching Learning Sean Sturm Educación Sophists Socrates maieutics assessment growth mindset As university teachers, are we heirs to the Sophists or to Socrates the philoso-pher? Do we teach students institutional know-how like academic ethics and strategies like writing and study skills, which offer shortcuts to institutional competence, or do we draw forth knowledge from students, eliciting wisdom from them and developing what the Greeks called ethos (character) and fidelity to a way of thinking? In short, do we teach a skill or a good? The first approach is sophistical (after the Greek teachers of rhetoric, the Sophists), and seeks to produce efficient knowledge-workers. The second approach is Socratic, or philosophical (after the Greek teacher of philosophy, Socrates), and seeks to produce good citizens. As these ancient names and terms suggest, this is a problem with a long history, but it is one with a local and contemporary resonance, in terms of the state of tertiary education both in Aotearoa/New Zealand, where I live and teach, and at this historical juncture. My question here is how we university teachers might negotiate this binary: how we might bridge these two positions and thereby per-haps transcend them. 2013 artículo científico 1138-9737 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=201029582002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2010 Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información application/pdf Universidad de Salamanca Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información (España) Num.3 Vol.14
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_201029582002
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2013
publisher Universidad de Salamanca
spellingShingle Sophistry And Philosophy: Two Approaches To Teaching Learning
Sean Sturm
Educación
Sophists
Socrates
maieutics
assessment
growth mindset
Sophistry And Philosophy: Two Approaches To Teaching Learning Sean Sturm Educación Sophists Socrates maieutics assessment growth mindset As university teachers, are we heirs to the Sophists or to Socrates the philoso-pher? Do we teach students institutional know-how like academic ethics and strategies like writing and study skills, which offer shortcuts to institutional competence, or do we draw forth knowledge from students, eliciting wisdom from them and developing what the Greeks called ethos (character) and fidelity to a way of thinking? In short, do we teach a skill or a good? The first approach is sophistical (after the Greek teachers of rhetoric, the Sophists), and seeks to produce efficient knowledge-workers. The second approach is Socratic, or philosophical (after the Greek teacher of philosophy, Socrates), and seeks to produce good citizens. As these ancient names and terms suggest, this is a problem with a long history, but it is one with a local and contemporary resonance, in terms of the state of tertiary education both in Aotearoa/New Zealand, where I live and teach, and at this historical juncture. My question here is how we university teachers might negotiate this binary: how we might bridge these two positions and thereby per-haps transcend them. 2013 artículo científico 1138-9737 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=201029582002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2010 Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información application/pdf Universidad de Salamanca Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información (España) Num.3 Vol.14
title Sophistry And Philosophy: Two Approaches To Teaching Learning
topic Educación
Sophists
Socrates
maieutics
assessment
growth mindset
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=201029582002