Deconstructionist and Poststructuralist Translation Approaches: Overview and critique
Fuente:
Redalyc
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1876466134376513536 |
|---|---|
| author | Sergio Bolaños Cuellar |
| author_facet | Sergio Bolaños Cuellar |
| contents | Deconstructionist and Poststructuralist Translation Approaches: Overview and critique Sergio Bolaños Cuellar Lengua y Literatura Deconstructionist Critique Poststructuralist Critique Deconstruction and Translation Studies Poststructuralism and Translation Studies It has become a commonplace to believe that deconstructionist and poststructuralist views on translation have opened new perspectives in Translation Studies. In this paper1, I attempt to show what the main tenets by the main authors in these theories are (Benjamin, Derrida, Berman, Venuti). I also try to show the line of thought that goes from Benjamin to Berman and Derrida and then to Venuti. Likewise, I focus my attention especially on a well-known controversy between Derrida and Searle on key aspects of language meaning. In the second part of the paper, I present the main criticisms made by Newmark, Pym, Searle, Arrojo, and Tymoczko, among others, to the deconstructionist and poststructuralist translation views of interpretation. Finally, I draw some conclusions. 2008 artículo científico 0120-338X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21911525014 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=219 Forma y Función application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Forma y Función (Colombia) Num.21 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_21911525014 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| spellingShingle | Deconstructionist and Poststructuralist Translation Approaches: Overview and critique Sergio Bolaños Cuellar Lengua y Literatura Deconstructionist Critique Poststructuralist Critique Deconstruction and Translation Studies Poststructuralism and Translation Studies Deconstructionist and Poststructuralist Translation Approaches: Overview and critique Sergio Bolaños Cuellar Lengua y Literatura Deconstructionist Critique Poststructuralist Critique Deconstruction and Translation Studies Poststructuralism and Translation Studies It has become a commonplace to believe that deconstructionist and poststructuralist views on translation have opened new perspectives in Translation Studies. In this paper1, I attempt to show what the main tenets by the main authors in these theories are (Benjamin, Derrida, Berman, Venuti). I also try to show the line of thought that goes from Benjamin to Berman and Derrida and then to Venuti. Likewise, I focus my attention especially on a well-known controversy between Derrida and Searle on key aspects of language meaning. In the second part of the paper, I present the main criticisms made by Newmark, Pym, Searle, Arrojo, and Tymoczko, among others, to the deconstructionist and poststructuralist translation views of interpretation. Finally, I draw some conclusions. 2008 artículo científico 0120-338X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21911525014 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=219 Forma y Función application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Forma y Función (Colombia) Num.21 |
| title | Deconstructionist and Poststructuralist Translation Approaches: Overview and critique |
| topic | Lengua y Literatura Deconstructionist Critique Poststructuralist Critique Deconstruction and Translation Studies Poststructuralism and Translation Studies |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21911525014 |