The influence of stimulus phase duration on discomfort and electrically induced torque of quadriceps femoris

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard E. Liebano
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876482300820062208
author Richard E. Liebano
author_facet Richard E. Liebano
contents The influence of stimulus phase duration on discomfort and electrically induced torque of quadriceps femoris Richard E. Liebano Thaís A. Rodrigues Martha T. Murazawa Alex R. Ward Salud torque physical therapy quadriceps muscle Electric stimulation Background: Although a number of studies have compared the influence of different electrical pulse parameters on maximum electrically induced torque (MEIT) and discomfort, the role of phase duration has been poorly investigated. Objective: To examine the variation in muscle torque and discomfort produced when electrically stimulating quadriceps femoris using pulsed current with three different phase durations in order to establish whether there are any advantages or disadvantages in varying the phase duration over the range examined. Method: This is a two repeated- measures, within-subject study conducted in a research laboratory. The study was divided into 2 parts with 19 healthy young adults in each part.In part 1, MEIT was determined for each phase duration (400, 700, and 1000 μs), using a biphasic pulsed current at a frequency of 50 Hz. In part 2, stimulus amplitude was increased until the contractions reached 40% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and the associated discomfort produced by each phase duration was measured. Results: In part 1 of the study, we found that the average MEITs generated with each phase duration (400, 700, and 1000 μs) were 55.0, 56.3, and 58.0% of MVIC respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant (p=.45). In part 2, we found a statistically significant increase in discomfort over the same range of phase durations. The results indicate that, for a given level of torque production, discomfort increases with increasing phase duration (p=.008). Conclusions: Greater muscle torque cannot be produced by increasing the stimulus phase duration over the range examined. Greater discomfort is produced by increasing the stimulus phase duration. 2013 artículo científico 1413-3555 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235028664009 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2350 Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia application/pdf Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia (Brasil) Num.5 Vol.17
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_235028664009
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2013
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
spellingShingle The influence of stimulus phase duration on discomfort and electrically induced torque of quadriceps femoris
Richard E. Liebano
Salud
torque
physical therapy
quadriceps muscle
Electric stimulation
The influence of stimulus phase duration on discomfort and electrically induced torque of quadriceps femoris Richard E. Liebano Thaís A. Rodrigues Martha T. Murazawa Alex R. Ward Salud torque physical therapy quadriceps muscle Electric stimulation Background: Although a number of studies have compared the influence of different electrical pulse parameters on maximum electrically induced torque (MEIT) and discomfort, the role of phase duration has been poorly investigated. Objective: To examine the variation in muscle torque and discomfort produced when electrically stimulating quadriceps femoris using pulsed current with three different phase durations in order to establish whether there are any advantages or disadvantages in varying the phase duration over the range examined. Method: This is a two repeated- measures, within-subject study conducted in a research laboratory. The study was divided into 2 parts with 19 healthy young adults in each part.In part 1, MEIT was determined for each phase duration (400, 700, and 1000 μs), using a biphasic pulsed current at a frequency of 50 Hz. In part 2, stimulus amplitude was increased until the contractions reached 40% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and the associated discomfort produced by each phase duration was measured. Results: In part 1 of the study, we found that the average MEITs generated with each phase duration (400, 700, and 1000 μs) were 55.0, 56.3, and 58.0% of MVIC respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant (p=.45). In part 2, we found a statistically significant increase in discomfort over the same range of phase durations. The results indicate that, for a given level of torque production, discomfort increases with increasing phase duration (p=.008). Conclusions: Greater muscle torque cannot be produced by increasing the stimulus phase duration over the range examined. Greater discomfort is produced by increasing the stimulus phase duration. 2013 artículo científico 1413-3555 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235028664009 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2350 Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia application/pdf Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia (Brasil) Num.5 Vol.17
title The influence of stimulus phase duration on discomfort and electrically induced torque of quadriceps femoris
topic Salud
torque
physical therapy
quadriceps muscle
Electric stimulation
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235028664009