Predictive equations for respiratory muscle strength according to international and Brazilian guidelines

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Isabela M. B. S. Pessoa
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:es
Veröffentlicht: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2014
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876437643610292224
author Isabela M. B. S. Pessoa
author_facet Isabela M. B. S. Pessoa
contents Predictive equations for respiratory muscle strength according to international and Brazilian guidelines Isabela M. B. S. Pessoa Miguel Houri Neto Dayane Montemezzo Luisa A. M. Silva Armèle Dornelas De Andrade Verônica F. Parreira Salud MIP MEP rehabilitation reference values physical therapy Background: The maximum static respiratory pressures, namely the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), reflect the strength of the respiratory muscles. These measures are simple, non-invasive, and have established diagnostic and prognostic value. This study is the first to examine the maximum respiratory pressures within the Brazilian population according to the recommendations proposed by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) and the Brazilian Thoracic Association (SBPT). Objective: To establish reference equations, mean values, and lower limits of normality for MIP and MEP for each age group and sex, as recommended by the ATS/ERS and SBPT. Method: We recruited 134 Brazilians living in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, aged 20-89 years, with a normal pulmonary function test and a body mass index within the normal range. We used a digital manometer that operationalized the variable maximum average pressure (MIP/MEP). At least five tests were performed for both MIP and MEP to take into account a possible learning effect. Results: We evaluated 74 women and 60 men. The equations were as follows: MIP=63.27-0.55 (age)+17.96 (gender)+0.58 (weight), r 2 of 34% and MEP= – 61.41+2.29 (age) – 0.03(age 2 )+33.72 (gender)+1.40 (waist), r 2 of 49%. Conclusion: In clinical practice, these equations could be used to calculate the predicted values of MIP and MEP for the Brazilian population. 2014 artículo científico 1413-3555 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235032490004 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2350 Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia application/pdf Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia (Brasil) Num.5 Vol.18
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_235032490004
institution Redalyc
language es
publishDate 2014
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
spellingShingle Predictive equations for respiratory muscle strength according to international and Brazilian guidelines
Isabela M. B. S. Pessoa
Salud
MIP
MEP
rehabilitation
reference values
physical therapy
Predictive equations for respiratory muscle strength according to international and Brazilian guidelines Isabela M. B. S. Pessoa Miguel Houri Neto Dayane Montemezzo Luisa A. M. Silva Armèle Dornelas De Andrade Verônica F. Parreira Salud MIP MEP rehabilitation reference values physical therapy Background: The maximum static respiratory pressures, namely the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), reflect the strength of the respiratory muscles. These measures are simple, non-invasive, and have established diagnostic and prognostic value. This study is the first to examine the maximum respiratory pressures within the Brazilian population according to the recommendations proposed by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) and the Brazilian Thoracic Association (SBPT). Objective: To establish reference equations, mean values, and lower limits of normality for MIP and MEP for each age group and sex, as recommended by the ATS/ERS and SBPT. Method: We recruited 134 Brazilians living in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, aged 20-89 years, with a normal pulmonary function test and a body mass index within the normal range. We used a digital manometer that operationalized the variable maximum average pressure (MIP/MEP). At least five tests were performed for both MIP and MEP to take into account a possible learning effect. Results: We evaluated 74 women and 60 men. The equations were as follows: MIP=63.27-0.55 (age)+17.96 (gender)+0.58 (weight), r 2 of 34% and MEP= – 61.41+2.29 (age) – 0.03(age 2 )+33.72 (gender)+1.40 (waist), r 2 of 49%. Conclusion: In clinical practice, these equations could be used to calculate the predicted values of MIP and MEP for the Brazilian population. 2014 artículo científico 1413-3555 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235032490004 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2350 Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia application/pdf Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia (Brasil) Num.5 Vol.18
title Predictive equations for respiratory muscle strength according to international and Brazilian guidelines
topic Salud
MIP
MEP
rehabilitation
reference values
physical therapy
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235032490004