Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo
Format: Artículo científico
Langue:en
Publié: Universidade de São Paulo 2017
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=257149916005
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866573989340512256
author Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo
author_facet Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo
contents Why has not it worked? An empirical application of the extended Burns and Scapens’ framework within the implementation of a controlling department Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo Neusa Sawczuk von Eggert Administración y Contabilidad study case Controllership implementation institutional theory The aim of this study is to understand the implementation of a controlling department within Bogt and Scapens’ framework (2014) as an empirical observation mechanism towards investigating rationalities that prevented its implementation. This study was conducted in a quite successful 63-year old company in the South of Brazil. We hope these results promote practical insight to those interested in supporting changes within this field of organizational environment. There had been two main reasons leading to such work: a lack of equivalent study in the scholarly literature as well as empirical application of Burns and Scapens’ framework (2000) reorganized by Bogt and Scapens (2014). Bogt and Scapens (2014), inspired by different logics (Bogt & Scapens, 2012) and in order to revaluate their original framework (2000), suggest the introduction o f a fairly important term: rationality. This new element shows the deliberate action from the organizational player – his/ her way of thinking. However, even with the introduction of rationales within the model by Bogt and Scapens (2014), rules and routines remain as important elements so that actions take shape. Used methodology consists of an interpretational case study with document analysis, direct observation, and application of semi-structured interviews. Through the interviews and discussions with individuals involved in the study, it can be observed that some rationality resulted in conflicts. Different rationales and the culture of the individual and the organization are relevant aspects observed in the speeches analyzed; all may be factors, which led to the gap within the process of implementation of controlling department in the organization. In addition, time factors suggested in the extended Bogt and Scapens’ (2014) framework is of utmost importance for changes must occur gradually. 2017 artículo científico 1519-7077 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=257149916005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2571 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças - USP application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo Revista Contabilidade & Finanças - USP (Brasil) Num.73 Vol.28
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_257149916005
language en
publishDate 2017
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
spellingShingle Why has not it worked? An empirical application of the extended Burns and Scapens’ framework within the implementation of a controlling department
Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo
Administración y Contabilidad
study case
Controllership
implementation
institutional theory
Why has not it worked? An empirical application of the extended Burns and Scapens’ framework within the implementation of a controlling department Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo Neusa Sawczuk von Eggert Administración y Contabilidad study case Controllership implementation institutional theory The aim of this study is to understand the implementation of a controlling department within Bogt and Scapens’ framework (2014) as an empirical observation mechanism towards investigating rationalities that prevented its implementation. This study was conducted in a quite successful 63-year old company in the South of Brazil. We hope these results promote practical insight to those interested in supporting changes within this field of organizational environment. There had been two main reasons leading to such work: a lack of equivalent study in the scholarly literature as well as empirical application of Burns and Scapens’ framework (2000) reorganized by Bogt and Scapens (2014). Bogt and Scapens (2014), inspired by different logics (Bogt & Scapens, 2012) and in order to revaluate their original framework (2000), suggest the introduction o f a fairly important term: rationality. This new element shows the deliberate action from the organizational player – his/ her way of thinking. However, even with the introduction of rationales within the model by Bogt and Scapens (2014), rules and routines remain as important elements so that actions take shape. Used methodology consists of an interpretational case study with document analysis, direct observation, and application of semi-structured interviews. Through the interviews and discussions with individuals involved in the study, it can be observed that some rationality resulted in conflicts. Different rationales and the culture of the individual and the organization are relevant aspects observed in the speeches analyzed; all may be factors, which led to the gap within the process of implementation of controlling department in the organization. In addition, time factors suggested in the extended Bogt and Scapens’ (2014) framework is of utmost importance for changes must occur gradually. 2017 artículo científico 1519-7077 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=257149916005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2571 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças - USP application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo Revista Contabilidade & Finanças - USP (Brasil) Num.73 Vol.28
title Why has not it worked? An empirical application of the extended Burns and Scapens’ framework within the implementation of a controlling department
topic Administración y Contabilidad
study case
Controllership
implementation
institutional theory
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=257149916005