Balloon Analogue Risk Task to assess decision - making in Acquired Brain Injury
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Universidad de San Buenaventura
2016
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876453280400277504 |
|---|---|
| author | Marina Areny Balagueró |
| author_facet | Marina Areny Balagueró |
| contents | Balloon Analogue Risk Task to assess decision - making in Acquired Brain Injury Marina Areny Balagueró Mercè Jodar Vicente Alberto García Molina Josep María Tormos Teresa Roig Rovira Psicología making Decision Iowa Gambling Task A cquired brain injury Balloon Analogue Risk Task Introduction: Although impairment in decision - making is a frequent consequence of frontal lobe injury, few instruments evaluate decision - making in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Most are difficult to use and require a well - preserved ability of complex verbal comprehension and executive functions. We propose the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as an alternative instrument to evaluate decision - making in ABI. Material and Methods: Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) we re administered to a clinical group of 30 patients with ABI and to a control group of 30 healthy participants; comparative study to assess possible differences in the results obtained; analysis to determine a possible correlation between the two tests betw een groups. Results: The results showed that BART is a sensitive instrument to detect differences in performance between a control group and a group of patients with ABI, p < .001, 95 % CI =537.21 - 1575.46, but do not correlate with IGT, p = .524, rab.c = ‒.134. Conclusions: Although IGT and BART were both designed to assess decision - making, the results obtained in our study show that the scores obtained by patients with ABI on both tests do not correlate. This clearly proves that IGT and BART measure diff erent aspects of decision - making. 2016 artículo científico 2011-2084 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=299043556005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2990 International Journal of Psychological Research application/pdf Universidad de San Buenaventura International Journal of Psychological Research (Colombia) Num.1 Vol.9 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_299043556005 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Universidad de San Buenaventura |
| spellingShingle | Balloon Analogue Risk Task to assess decision - making in Acquired Brain Injury Marina Areny Balagueró Psicología making Decision Iowa Gambling Task A cquired brain injury Balloon Analogue Risk Task Balloon Analogue Risk Task to assess decision - making in Acquired Brain Injury Marina Areny Balagueró Mercè Jodar Vicente Alberto García Molina Josep María Tormos Teresa Roig Rovira Psicología making Decision Iowa Gambling Task A cquired brain injury Balloon Analogue Risk Task Introduction: Although impairment in decision - making is a frequent consequence of frontal lobe injury, few instruments evaluate decision - making in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Most are difficult to use and require a well - preserved ability of complex verbal comprehension and executive functions. We propose the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as an alternative instrument to evaluate decision - making in ABI. Material and Methods: Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) we re administered to a clinical group of 30 patients with ABI and to a control group of 30 healthy participants; comparative study to assess possible differences in the results obtained; analysis to determine a possible correlation between the two tests betw een groups. Results: The results showed that BART is a sensitive instrument to detect differences in performance between a control group and a group of patients with ABI, p < .001, 95 % CI =537.21 - 1575.46, but do not correlate with IGT, p = .524, rab.c = ‒.134. Conclusions: Although IGT and BART were both designed to assess decision - making, the results obtained in our study show that the scores obtained by patients with ABI on both tests do not correlate. This clearly proves that IGT and BART measure diff erent aspects of decision - making. 2016 artículo científico 2011-2084 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=299043556005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=2990 International Journal of Psychological Research application/pdf Universidad de San Buenaventura International Journal of Psychological Research (Colombia) Num.1 Vol.9 |
| title | Balloon Analogue Risk Task to assess decision - making in Acquired Brain Injury |
| topic | Psicología making Decision Iowa Gambling Task A cquired brain injury Balloon Analogue Risk Task |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=299043556005 |