Dietary supplementation of powdered and encapsulated probiotic: In vivo study on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck
Fuente:
Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Sprache: | en |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1876460424793161728 |
|---|---|
| author | Ilham Ardiansah |
| author_facet | Ilham Ardiansah |
| contents | Dietary supplementation of powdered and encapsulated probiotic: In vivo study on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck Ilham Ardiansah Kholifatus Sholiha Osfar Sjofjan Agrociencias Feed poultry nutrition probiotic This research was aimed to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation of either powdered or encapsulated probiotic on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck. One hundred twenty male day old duck (DOD) were distributed to 6 different dietary groups, included 2 probiotic forms of either powdered (T1) or encapsulated (T2) and 3 levels: 0% (L0), 0.2% (L1), 0.4% (L2). They were reared using pen cages for 42 days (6 weeks). Observed variables were relative carcass, giblet weight (gizzard, heart, liver) and intestinal morphometry (villus height, villus width, crypt depth). Data were analyzed by Nested of Completely Randomized Design ANOVA and if there was significant effect followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The result showed that there was no significant effect (p > 0.05) of the form of either powdered or encapsulated probiotic on relative carcass, giblet weight, and intestinal morphometry. However, increasing level of probiotic have significant effect (p < 0.05) on relative carcass, villus height, and villus width, but did not significantly affect giblet weight and crypt depth. In conclusion, supplementation of either powdered or encapsulated probiotic has similar result, but it is suggested to use 0.4% of encapsulated probiotic (4 kg ton-1 of feed) in local duck diet. 2020 artículo científico 1806-2636 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=303162575017 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/303162575017.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/movil 10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.47140 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3031 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences application/pdf Universidade Estadual de Maringá Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Brasil) Vol.42 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_303162575017 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
| spellingShingle | Dietary supplementation of powdered and encapsulated probiotic: In vivo study on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck Ilham Ardiansah Agrociencias Feed poultry nutrition probiotic Dietary supplementation of powdered and encapsulated probiotic: In vivo study on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck Ilham Ardiansah Kholifatus Sholiha Osfar Sjofjan Agrociencias Feed poultry nutrition probiotic This research was aimed to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation of either powdered or encapsulated probiotic on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck. One hundred twenty male day old duck (DOD) were distributed to 6 different dietary groups, included 2 probiotic forms of either powdered (T1) or encapsulated (T2) and 3 levels: 0% (L0), 0.2% (L1), 0.4% (L2). They were reared using pen cages for 42 days (6 weeks). Observed variables were relative carcass, giblet weight (gizzard, heart, liver) and intestinal morphometry (villus height, villus width, crypt depth). Data were analyzed by Nested of Completely Randomized Design ANOVA and if there was significant effect followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The result showed that there was no significant effect (p > 0.05) of the form of either powdered or encapsulated probiotic on relative carcass, giblet weight, and intestinal morphometry. However, increasing level of probiotic have significant effect (p < 0.05) on relative carcass, villus height, and villus width, but did not significantly affect giblet weight and crypt depth. In conclusion, supplementation of either powdered or encapsulated probiotic has similar result, but it is suggested to use 0.4% of encapsulated probiotic (4 kg ton-1 of feed) in local duck diet. 2020 artículo científico 1806-2636 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=303162575017 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/303162575017.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/movil 10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.47140 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3031 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences application/pdf Universidade Estadual de Maringá Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Brasil) Vol.42 |
| title | Dietary supplementation of powdered and encapsulated probiotic: In vivo study on relative carcass, giblet weight and intestinal morphometry of local duck |
| topic | Agrociencias Feed poultry nutrition probiotic |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=303162575017 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/303162575017.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3031/303162575017/movil |