Longitudinal Strain at Rest Does not Predict Stress Echo Results

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Natalio Gastaldello
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología 2016
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876428249526960128
author Natalio Gastaldello
author_facet Natalio Gastaldello
contents Longitudinal Strain at Rest Does not Predict Stress Echo Results Natalio Gastaldello Pablo Merlo Miguel Amor Diego Alasia Marcela Galello María Rousse Norberto Caso Cristian Caniggia Víctor Darú Jorge Lowenstein Medicina Speckle tracking 2D longitudinal strain Stress echocardiography Background: Stress echo shows ischemia as a transient regional motility disorder. The subjective visual analysis which is depend- ent on the operator’s experience has prompted the search for a semiautomatic method to mitigate this limitation and improve the reliability and reproducibility of the test. This has generated a growing interest in the introduction of two-dimensional longitudinal strain before, during and after stress echo. If useful, its assessment during the different stress stages would attenuate other limi- tations, such as the inability to achieve submaximal heart rate, difficult visualization of more subtle disorders and delay in image acquisition, which increases false negative results. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether longitudinal strain analysis at rest is able to predict the outcome of stress echo when there is no visual evidence of contractile disorders, and whether baseline longitudinal strain is different in patients with significant coronary artery disease compared with patients not presenting this disease (in their previous evaluation before the test). Methods: The study compared longitudinal strain results at rest in 62 patients with positive stress echo consecutively recruited during a 12-month period, half of whom underwent coronary angiography(Group A) and the other half did not undertake this study (Group B) versus a control group (Group C) with negative test and without coronary angiography. Results: Longitudinal strain showed no significant difference between groups A and B (-21.8%±2.4% vs. -21.5% ±2.5%) and neither between patients with positive test (Group A+B) versus Group C (-21.67 % ±2.4% vs. -21.9 %±2.8%). Conclusions: Two-dimensional longitudinal strain did not predict stress echo results or the presence of significant coronary artery disease in the group of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. 2016 artículo científico 0034-7000 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305347333012 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3053 Revista Argentina de Cardiología application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología Revista Argentina de Cardiología (Argentina) Num.4 Vol.84
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_305347333012
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología
spellingShingle Longitudinal Strain at Rest Does not Predict Stress Echo Results
Natalio Gastaldello
Medicina
Speckle tracking
2D longitudinal strain
Stress echocardiography
Longitudinal Strain at Rest Does not Predict Stress Echo Results Natalio Gastaldello Pablo Merlo Miguel Amor Diego Alasia Marcela Galello María Rousse Norberto Caso Cristian Caniggia Víctor Darú Jorge Lowenstein Medicina Speckle tracking 2D longitudinal strain Stress echocardiography Background: Stress echo shows ischemia as a transient regional motility disorder. The subjective visual analysis which is depend- ent on the operator’s experience has prompted the search for a semiautomatic method to mitigate this limitation and improve the reliability and reproducibility of the test. This has generated a growing interest in the introduction of two-dimensional longitudinal strain before, during and after stress echo. If useful, its assessment during the different stress stages would attenuate other limi- tations, such as the inability to achieve submaximal heart rate, difficult visualization of more subtle disorders and delay in image acquisition, which increases false negative results. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether longitudinal strain analysis at rest is able to predict the outcome of stress echo when there is no visual evidence of contractile disorders, and whether baseline longitudinal strain is different in patients with significant coronary artery disease compared with patients not presenting this disease (in their previous evaluation before the test). Methods: The study compared longitudinal strain results at rest in 62 patients with positive stress echo consecutively recruited during a 12-month period, half of whom underwent coronary angiography(Group A) and the other half did not undertake this study (Group B) versus a control group (Group C) with negative test and without coronary angiography. Results: Longitudinal strain showed no significant difference between groups A and B (-21.8%±2.4% vs. -21.5% ±2.5%) and neither between patients with positive test (Group A+B) versus Group C (-21.67 % ±2.4% vs. -21.9 %±2.8%). Conclusions: Two-dimensional longitudinal strain did not predict stress echo results or the presence of significant coronary artery disease in the group of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. 2016 artículo científico 0034-7000 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305347333012 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3053 Revista Argentina de Cardiología application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología Revista Argentina de Cardiología (Argentina) Num.4 Vol.84
title Longitudinal Strain at Rest Does not Predict Stress Echo Results
topic Medicina
Speckle tracking
2D longitudinal strain
Stress echocardiography
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305347333012