Aortic Annulus Enlargement vs. Conventional Surgery in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología
2017
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876433018724286464 |
|---|---|
| author | Guillermo I. StÖger |
| author_facet | Guillermo I. StÖger |
| contents | Aortic Annulus Enlargement vs. Conventional Surgery in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement Guillermo I. StÖger Ricardo G. Marenchino Emiliano Rossi Alberto Domenech Pablo F. Oberti Vadim Kotowicz Medicina Patient Cardiac Surgery Small Aortic Root prosthesis Mismatch Aortic Valve Replacement Background: The goal of aortic valve replacement for severe stenosis is to relieve symptoms and prevent the mortality associated with the disease. Appropriate prosthetic valve size must be selected for each patient according to body surface area to avoid patient- prosthesis mismatch. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate transvalvular gradient reduction at one-year follow-up in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing valve replacement with annular enlargement vs. conventional replacement surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with small aortic annulus undergoing valve replacement from January 2011 to December 2015. Two groups were selected: Group AAE consisting of patients in whom aortic annular enlarge- ment was necessary and Group RVA19 involving patients in whom a #19 mm prosthetic valve was conventionally implanted. Results: Postoperative gradients (within the first 3 months and at one year) were significantly lower in the group with aortic annular enlargement. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time increased 14 minutes in Group AAE. Bioprostheses were used in most cases. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Conclusions: Aortic annular enlargement improves postoperative, short-term and at one year follow-up transvalvular gradients. 2017 artículo científico 0034-7000 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305350878008 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3053 Revista Argentina de Cardiología application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología Revista Argentina de Cardiología (Argentina) Num.1 Vol.85 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_305350878008 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología |
| spellingShingle | Aortic Annulus Enlargement vs. Conventional Surgery in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement Guillermo I. StÖger Medicina Patient Cardiac Surgery Small Aortic Root prosthesis Mismatch Aortic Valve Replacement Aortic Annulus Enlargement vs. Conventional Surgery in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement Guillermo I. StÖger Ricardo G. Marenchino Emiliano Rossi Alberto Domenech Pablo F. Oberti Vadim Kotowicz Medicina Patient Cardiac Surgery Small Aortic Root prosthesis Mismatch Aortic Valve Replacement Background: The goal of aortic valve replacement for severe stenosis is to relieve symptoms and prevent the mortality associated with the disease. Appropriate prosthetic valve size must be selected for each patient according to body surface area to avoid patient- prosthesis mismatch. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate transvalvular gradient reduction at one-year follow-up in patients with small aortic annulus undergoing valve replacement with annular enlargement vs. conventional replacement surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with small aortic annulus undergoing valve replacement from January 2011 to December 2015. Two groups were selected: Group AAE consisting of patients in whom aortic annular enlarge- ment was necessary and Group RVA19 involving patients in whom a #19 mm prosthetic valve was conventionally implanted. Results: Postoperative gradients (within the first 3 months and at one year) were significantly lower in the group with aortic annular enlargement. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time increased 14 minutes in Group AAE. Bioprostheses were used in most cases. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Conclusions: Aortic annular enlargement improves postoperative, short-term and at one year follow-up transvalvular gradients. 2017 artículo científico 0034-7000 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305350878008 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3053 Revista Argentina de Cardiología application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología Revista Argentina de Cardiología (Argentina) Num.1 Vol.85 |
| title | Aortic Annulus Enlargement vs. Conventional Surgery in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement |
| topic | Medicina Patient Cardiac Surgery Small Aortic Root prosthesis Mismatch Aortic Valve Replacement |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305350878008 |