Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=307276195028 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/307276195028.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/movil https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v45i1.61437 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Burnout Syndrome in Primary Health Care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic Alberto Sumiya Eloisa Pavesi Rafael de Menezes Reis Juliberta Alves de Macêdo Carlos Podalirio Borges de Almeida Júlia Spengler Fabiano Silva Locks Júnior Celita Salmaso Trelha Medicina 19 Covid health personnel Primary health care professional burnout Workers in Primary Health Care (PHC) play a key role in coping with COVID-19, which required personal and work-flow changes, causing physical and emotional overload and stress, which could lead to Burnout Syndrome (BS). The objective of this study was to check the prevalence of BS in health professionals working in PHC in the municipality of Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The research was carried out between November 2020 and May 2021, a sociodemographic questionnaire, and the Brazilian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), which contains 22 questions and three dimensions - Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP) and Personal Fulfillment (PF), were applied. Data were collected and analyzed descriptively with subsequent statistical comparison. Participants were50 volunteers aged 40.1 ± 9.5 years, time in the profession of 10.8 ± 7.9 years. Results of the MBI-HSS showed the prevalence of risk was moderate for EE and high for DP and PF. However, no significant difference was detected between the MBI-HSS dimensions and sociodemographic variables. In conclusion, the prevalence of risk was 17.6.11.4 points in EE (moderate); 6.6.5.0 points in DP (moderate) and 36.8.6.6 points in RP (high), indicating that the evaluated population already demands some need for contingency or preventive care because it has a clear predisposition to BS. However, there was no statistical association with sociodemographic variables. 2023 artículo científico 1679-9291 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=307276195028 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/307276195028.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3072/307276195028/movil https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v45i1.61437 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3072 Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences application/pdf Universidade Estadual de Maringá Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences (Brasil) Vol.45