Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876480450172551168
author Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente
author_facet Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente
contents Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente Karla Maria Silva de Faria Klebber Teodomiro Martins Formiga Geografía Social Drainage tax Systematic review Sustainable drainage Low impact development Payment for urban environmental services Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction. 2024 artículo científico 0103-1570 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321378771021 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/321378771021.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/movil 10.14393/SN-v36-2024-71221x en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3213 Sociedade & Natureza application/pdf Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Sociedade & Natureza (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.36
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_321378771021
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2024
publisher Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
spellingShingle Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage
Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente
Geografía Social
Drainage tax
Systematic review
Sustainable drainage
Low impact development
Payment for urban environmental services
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente Karla Maria Silva de Faria Klebber Teodomiro Martins Formiga Geografía Social Drainage tax Systematic review Sustainable drainage Low impact development Payment for urban environmental services Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction. 2024 artículo científico 0103-1570 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321378771021 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/321378771021.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/movil 10.14393/SN-v36-2024-71221x en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3213 Sociedade & Natureza application/pdf Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Sociedade & Natureza (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.36
title Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage
topic Geografía Social
Drainage tax
Systematic review
Sustainable drainage
Low impact development
Payment for urban environmental services
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321378771021
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/321378771021.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3213/321378771021/movil