Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | es |
| Published: |
Sociedad de Neurología, Psiquiatría y Neurocirugía de Chile
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=331532367006 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Los cuestionamientos de Jean-Paul Sartre a Freud ¿son aún válidos? Filosofía y psicoanálisis en el nuevo siglo Gustavo Figueroa C. Medicina 21 Sartre bad faith philosophy 52 (3): 185 The philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre carried out an ontological analysis of the underlying assumptions of Freud. He rejected the notion of the unconscious and replaced it by the conscious and added the concepts of freedom, original choice, and bad faith, to better understand the neurosis. These neurosis results from bad faith projects freely chosen but not genuinely assumed. In proposing the Existential psychoanalysis he contributed to a deepening of the theory and practice of Freudian psychoanalysis. Sartre ́s outline has been little studied and deepened. Binswanger, Heidegger, Ricoeur, and Boss have sought to continue the footsteps of Sartre albeit indirectly, supported by their respective metaphysical conceptions. Martín-Santos has been an exception and his contribution was focused on the basics of existential psychotherapy. We don’t still have studies written by psychiatrists who creatively take advantage of the insights of Sartre and his detractors. 2014 artículo científico 0034-7388 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=331532367006 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3315 Revista Chilena de Neuropsiquiatría application/pdf Sociedad de Neurología, Psiquiatría y Neurocirugía de Chile Revista Chilena de Neuropsiquiatría (Chile) Num.3 Vol.52