From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) via Philosophy of Mind: Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: BENCE NANAY
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea 2013
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876462472686206976
author BENCE NANAY
author_facet BENCE NANAY
contents From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) via Philosophy of Mind: Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum BENCE NANAY Filosofía Emotions Philip Kitcher Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Literature A recent focus of Philip Kitcher’s research has been, somewhat surprisingly in the light of his earlier work, the philosophical analyses of literary works and operas. Some may see a discontinuity in Kitcher’s oeuvre in this respect—it may be difficult to see how his earlier contributions to philosophy of science rela- te to this much less mainstream approach to philosophy. The aim of this paper is to show that there is no such discontinuity: Kitcher’s contributions to the philosophy of science and his more recent endeavors into the philosophy of literature and of music are grounded in the same big picture attitude towards the human mind—an attitude that he would undoubtedly call ‘pragmatic’: one that emphasizes the importance of tho- se mental processes that are not (or not entirely) rational. 2013 artículo científico 0495-4548 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339730822005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3397 THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia application/pdf Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia (España) Num.2 Vol.28
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_339730822005
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2013
publisher Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
spellingShingle From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) via Philosophy of Mind: Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum
BENCE NANAY
Filosofía
Emotions
Philip Kitcher
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Literature
From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) via Philosophy of Mind: Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum BENCE NANAY Filosofía Emotions Philip Kitcher Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Literature A recent focus of Philip Kitcher’s research has been, somewhat surprisingly in the light of his earlier work, the philosophical analyses of literary works and operas. Some may see a discontinuity in Kitcher’s oeuvre in this respect—it may be difficult to see how his earlier contributions to philosophy of science rela- te to this much less mainstream approach to philosophy. The aim of this paper is to show that there is no such discontinuity: Kitcher’s contributions to the philosophy of science and his more recent endeavors into the philosophy of literature and of music are grounded in the same big picture attitude towards the human mind—an attitude that he would undoubtedly call ‘pragmatic’: one that emphasizes the importance of tho- se mental processes that are not (or not entirely) rational. 2013 artículo científico 0495-4548 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339730822005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3397 THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia application/pdf Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia (España) Num.2 Vol.28
title From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) via Philosophy of Mind: Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum
topic Filosofía
Emotions
Philip Kitcher
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Literature
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339730822005