Ideology and Knowledge-How: A Rylean Perspective

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Kremer
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876456348910092288
author Michael Kremer
author_facet Michael Kremer
contents Ideology and Knowledge-How: A Rylean Perspective Michael Kremer Filosofía how how how how how In work culminating in Know How (2009), Jason Stanley argues, against Gilbert Ryle, that knowledge-how is a species of knowledge-that. In How Propaganda Works (2015), Stanley portrays this work as undermining a “flawed ideology” supporting elitist valuations of intellectual work and workers. However, the link between Stanley’s two philosophical projects is weak. Ryle’s distinction between knowledge-how and knowledge-that lacks the political consequences foreseen by Stanley. Versions of “intellectualism” have as much potential to align with hierarchical political systems as do versions of “anti-intellectualism.” Consequently, the debate about knowledge-how and knowledge-that comes apart from Stanley’s more recent concerns about flawed ideologies. 2016 artículo científico 0495-4548 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339748382003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3397 THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia application/pdf Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia (España) Num.3 Vol.31
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_339748382003
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2016
publisher Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
spellingShingle Ideology and Knowledge-How: A Rylean Perspective
Michael Kremer
Filosofía
how
how
how
how
how
Ideology and Knowledge-How: A Rylean Perspective Michael Kremer Filosofía how how how how how In work culminating in Know How (2009), Jason Stanley argues, against Gilbert Ryle, that knowledge-how is a species of knowledge-that. In How Propaganda Works (2015), Stanley portrays this work as undermining a “flawed ideology” supporting elitist valuations of intellectual work and workers. However, the link between Stanley’s two philosophical projects is weak. Ryle’s distinction between knowledge-how and knowledge-that lacks the political consequences foreseen by Stanley. Versions of “intellectualism” have as much potential to align with hierarchical political systems as do versions of “anti-intellectualism.” Consequently, the debate about knowledge-how and knowledge-that comes apart from Stanley’s more recent concerns about flawed ideologies. 2016 artículo científico 0495-4548 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339748382003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3397 THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia application/pdf Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia (España) Num.3 Vol.31
title Ideology and Knowledge-How: A Rylean Perspective
topic Filosofía
how
how
how
how
how
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339748382003