Diagnosing Sorites arguments

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Robert Stalnaker
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea 2018
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876427056711991296
author Robert Stalnaker
author_facet Robert Stalnaker
contents Diagnosing Sorites arguments Robert Stalnaker Filosofía context Vagueness dependence epistemicism Sorites paradox This is a discussion of Delia Fara’s theory of vagueness, and of its solution to the sorites paradox, criticizing some of the details of the account, but agreeing that its central insight will be a part of any solution to the problem. I also consider a wider range of philosophical puzzles that involve arguments that are structurally similar to the argument of the sorites paradox, and argue that the main ideas of her account of vagueness helps to respond to some of those puzzles. 2018 artículo científico 0495-4548 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339757246013 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/339757246013.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/movil https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.19625 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3397 THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia application/pdf Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia (España) Num.3 Vol.33
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_339757246013
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2018
publisher Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
spellingShingle Diagnosing Sorites arguments
Robert Stalnaker
Filosofía
context
Vagueness
dependence
epistemicism
Sorites paradox
Diagnosing Sorites arguments Robert Stalnaker Filosofía context Vagueness dependence epistemicism Sorites paradox This is a discussion of Delia Fara’s theory of vagueness, and of its solution to the sorites paradox, criticizing some of the details of the account, but agreeing that its central insight will be a part of any solution to the problem. I also consider a wider range of philosophical puzzles that involve arguments that are structurally similar to the argument of the sorites paradox, and argue that the main ideas of her account of vagueness helps to respond to some of those puzzles. 2018 artículo científico 0495-4548 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339757246013 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/339757246013.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/movil https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.19625 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3397 THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia application/pdf Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia (España) Num.3 Vol.33
title Diagnosing Sorites arguments
topic Filosofía
context
Vagueness
dependence
epistemicism
Sorites paradox
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339757246013
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/339757246013.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339757246013/movil
https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.19625