Précis of Uncut
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico
2021
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876479763102564352 |
|---|---|
| author | David Ripley |
| author_facet | David Ripley |
| contents | Précis of Uncut David Ripley Filosofía Truth Paradox Meaning Validity Vagueness Uncut is a book about two kinds of paradoxes: paradoxes involving truth and its relatives, like the liar paradox, and paradoxes involving vagueness. There are lots of ways to look at these paradoxes, and lots of puzzles generated by them, and Uncut ignores most of this variety to focus on a single issue. That issue: do our words mean what they seem to mean, and if so, how can this be? I claim that our words do mean what they seem to, and yet our language is not undermined by paradox. By developing a distinctive theory of meaning, I show how this can be. 2021 artículo científico 0326-1301 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=340070557003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/340070557003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/movil https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2021.462 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3400 Análisis Filosófico application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico Análisis Filosófico (Argentina) Num.2 Vol.41 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_340070557003 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico |
| spellingShingle | Précis of Uncut David Ripley Filosofía Truth Paradox Meaning Validity Vagueness Précis of Uncut David Ripley Filosofía Truth Paradox Meaning Validity Vagueness Uncut is a book about two kinds of paradoxes: paradoxes involving truth and its relatives, like the liar paradox, and paradoxes involving vagueness. There are lots of ways to look at these paradoxes, and lots of puzzles generated by them, and Uncut ignores most of this variety to focus on a single issue. That issue: do our words mean what they seem to mean, and if so, how can this be? I claim that our words do mean what they seem to, and yet our language is not undermined by paradox. By developing a distinctive theory of meaning, I show how this can be. 2021 artículo científico 0326-1301 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=340070557003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/340070557003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/movil https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2021.462 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3400 Análisis Filosófico application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico Análisis Filosófico (Argentina) Num.2 Vol.41 |
| title | Précis of Uncut |
| topic | Filosofía Truth Paradox Meaning Validity Vagueness |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=340070557003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/340070557003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340070557003/movil https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2021.462 |