What the adoption problem does not show
Fuente:
Redalyc
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico
2022
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1876462559695994880 |
|---|---|
| author | Camillo Fiore |
| author_facet | Camillo Fiore |
| contents | What the adoption problem does not show Camillo Fiore Filosofía Anti Logica utens Adoption Problem Revisability of Logic exceptionalism about Logic Saul Kripke proposed a skeptical challenge that Romina Padró defended and popularized by the name of the Adoption Problem. The challenge is that, given a certain definition of adoption, there are some logical principles that cannot be adopted—paradigmatic cases being Universal Instantiation and Modus Ponens. Kripke has used the Adoption Problem to argue that there is an important sense in which logic is not revisable. In this essay, I defend two independent claims. First, that the Adoption Problem does not entail that logic is never revisable in the sense that Kripke addresses. Second, that, to assess whether an agent can revise their logic in the sense that Kripke addresses, it is best to consider a different definition of adoption, according to which Universal Instantiation and Modus Ponens are sometimes adoptable. 2022 artículo científico 0326-1301 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=340071858005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/340071858005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/movil https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2022.402 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3400 Análisis Filosófico application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico Análisis Filosófico (Argentina) Num.1 Vol.42 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_340071858005 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico |
| spellingShingle | What the adoption problem does not show Camillo Fiore Filosofía Anti Logica utens Adoption Problem Revisability of Logic exceptionalism about Logic What the adoption problem does not show Camillo Fiore Filosofía Anti Logica utens Adoption Problem Revisability of Logic exceptionalism about Logic Saul Kripke proposed a skeptical challenge that Romina Padró defended and popularized by the name of the Adoption Problem. The challenge is that, given a certain definition of adoption, there are some logical principles that cannot be adopted—paradigmatic cases being Universal Instantiation and Modus Ponens. Kripke has used the Adoption Problem to argue that there is an important sense in which logic is not revisable. In this essay, I defend two independent claims. First, that the Adoption Problem does not entail that logic is never revisable in the sense that Kripke addresses. Second, that, to assess whether an agent can revise their logic in the sense that Kripke addresses, it is best to consider a different definition of adoption, according to which Universal Instantiation and Modus Ponens are sometimes adoptable. 2022 artículo científico 0326-1301 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=340071858005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/340071858005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/movil https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2022.402 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3400 Análisis Filosófico application/pdf Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico Análisis Filosófico (Argentina) Num.1 Vol.42 |
| title | What the adoption problem does not show |
| topic | Filosofía Anti Logica utens Adoption Problem Revisability of Logic exceptionalism about Logic |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=340071858005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/340071858005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3400/340071858005/movil https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2022.402 |