Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral versus Intravascular Magnesium in the Prevention of Hypomagnesemia and Arrhythmia after CABG

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Mansour Jannati
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2018
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876435240541487104
author Mansour Jannati
author_facet Mansour Jannati
contents Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral versus Intravascular Magnesium in the Prevention of Hypomagnesemia and Arrhythmia after CABG Mansour Jannati Shahrbanoo Shahbazi Laleh Eshaghi Medicina Oral Cardiac Intravenous Arrhythmias Administration Objective: Cardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries. Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition. Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia. Methods: In this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576). Results: During the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral groups, respectively (OR: 0.428). Conclusion: Providing 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as a promising and cost-effective method. 2018 artículo científico 0102-7638 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=398957528005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/398957528005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/movil 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0070 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3989 Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular/Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery application/pdf Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular/Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Brasil) Num.5 Vol.33
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_398957528005
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
spellingShingle Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral versus Intravascular Magnesium in the Prevention of Hypomagnesemia and Arrhythmia after CABG
Mansour Jannati
Medicina
Oral
Cardiac
Intravenous
Arrhythmias
Administration
Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral versus Intravascular Magnesium in the Prevention of Hypomagnesemia and Arrhythmia after CABG Mansour Jannati Shahrbanoo Shahbazi Laleh Eshaghi Medicina Oral Cardiac Intravenous Arrhythmias Administration Objective: Cardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries. Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition. Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia. Methods: In this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576). Results: During the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral groups, respectively (OR: 0.428). Conclusion: Providing 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as a promising and cost-effective method. 2018 artículo científico 0102-7638 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=398957528005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/398957528005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/movil 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0070 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3989 Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular/Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery application/pdf Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular/Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Brasil) Num.5 Vol.33
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral versus Intravascular Magnesium in the Prevention of Hypomagnesemia and Arrhythmia after CABG
topic Medicina
Oral
Cardiac
Intravenous
Arrhythmias
Administration
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=398957528005
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/398957528005.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3989/398957528005/movil