Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=402741202012 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866577023633195008 |
|---|---|
| author | Juan Pablo Hugues Arthur |
| author_facet | Juan Pablo Hugues Arthur |
| contents | The Legal Value of Prior Steps to Arbitration in International Law of Foreign Investment:Two (Different?) Approaches, One Outcome Juan Pablo Hugues Arthur Derecho tional tribunals seisin of interna investment arbitration admissibility of claims interpretation of treaties The present article proposes two different approaches to determine whether the failure to comply with prior steps to arbitration —negotiations or domestic litigation for a period of time— is a matter pertaining to the admissibility of a claim, jurisdiction or seisin of a tribunal. Under the first approach, the non-compliance with the prior steps represent an implicit rejection of the arbitration offer made by the host State and thus their legal value is jurisdictional strictu sensu. Under the second approach, the legal value of the prior steps is that they constitute prerequisite conditions for the seisin of a tribunal. Under either approach, the juridical outcome proposed by this article is that a tribunal may not address the merits of the case submitted. 2015 artículo científico 2448-7872 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=402741202012 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=4027 Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional application/pdf Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional (México) Vol.XV |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_402741202012 |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
| spellingShingle | The Legal Value of Prior Steps to Arbitration in International Law of Foreign Investment:Two (Different?) Approaches, One Outcome Juan Pablo Hugues Arthur Derecho tional tribunals seisin of interna investment arbitration admissibility of claims interpretation of treaties The Legal Value of Prior Steps to Arbitration in International Law of Foreign Investment:Two (Different?) Approaches, One Outcome Juan Pablo Hugues Arthur Derecho tional tribunals seisin of interna investment arbitration admissibility of claims interpretation of treaties The present article proposes two different approaches to determine whether the failure to comply with prior steps to arbitration —negotiations or domestic litigation for a period of time— is a matter pertaining to the admissibility of a claim, jurisdiction or seisin of a tribunal. Under the first approach, the non-compliance with the prior steps represent an implicit rejection of the arbitration offer made by the host State and thus their legal value is jurisdictional strictu sensu. Under the second approach, the legal value of the prior steps is that they constitute prerequisite conditions for the seisin of a tribunal. Under either approach, the juridical outcome proposed by this article is that a tribunal may not address the merits of the case submitted. 2015 artículo científico 2448-7872 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=402741202012 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=4027 Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional application/pdf Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional (México) Vol.XV |
| title | The Legal Value of Prior Steps to Arbitration in International Law of Foreign Investment:Two (Different?) Approaches, One Outcome |
| topic | Derecho tional tribunals seisin of interna investment arbitration admissibility of claims interpretation of treaties |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=402741202012 |