Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: W. A. Barragán-Hernández
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876454410334240768
author W. A. Barragán-Hernández
author_facet W. A. Barragán-Hernández
contents Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia W. A. Barragán-Hernández L. Mahecha-Ledesma J. Angulo-Arizala M. Olivera-Angel Veterinaria Milk quality multivariate analysis river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) The aim of this study was to classify and characterize the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia based on the fat, protein, and total solid (TS) contents. Using a hierarchical procedure, data on milk from river buffaloes (n = 7,726) and cows (n = 49,330) were filtered and subjected to cluster analysis in order to generate three groups: Normal (N), High quality (HQ) and Poor Quality (PQ). The categorized database was then randomly separated into two sets (training and validation) and a discriminant analysis was applied. In total, 37.3% of river buffalo milk samples were classified as N (6.80% fat, 4.34% protein, and 16.80% TS), 13% as HQ (9.41% fat, 4.93% protein, and 19.50% TS), and 43.7% as PQ (3.95% fat, 3.92% protein, and 13.7% TS). In contrast, 41.8% of cow milk samples were classified as N (3.64% fat, 3.37% protein, 12.42% TS), 41.2% as PQ (2.71% fat, 3.08% protein, and 10.6% TS), and 16.9% as HQ (5.46% fat, 4.01% protein, and 14.82% TS). The discriminant models for both river buffalo and cow milk were able to classify milk in the N and PQ groups with >90% accuracy, and that in the HQ group with >85% accuracy. 2019 artículo científico 0120-2952 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407660734005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/407660734005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/movil 10.15446/rfmvz.v66n1.79401 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=4076 Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia (Colombia) Num.1 Vol.66
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_407660734005
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2019
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
spellingShingle Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia
W. A. Barragán-Hernández
Veterinaria
Milk quality
multivariate analysis
river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia W. A. Barragán-Hernández L. Mahecha-Ledesma J. Angulo-Arizala M. Olivera-Angel Veterinaria Milk quality multivariate analysis river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) The aim of this study was to classify and characterize the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia based on the fat, protein, and total solid (TS) contents. Using a hierarchical procedure, data on milk from river buffaloes (n = 7,726) and cows (n = 49,330) were filtered and subjected to cluster analysis in order to generate three groups: Normal (N), High quality (HQ) and Poor Quality (PQ). The categorized database was then randomly separated into two sets (training and validation) and a discriminant analysis was applied. In total, 37.3% of river buffalo milk samples were classified as N (6.80% fat, 4.34% protein, and 16.80% TS), 13% as HQ (9.41% fat, 4.93% protein, and 19.50% TS), and 43.7% as PQ (3.95% fat, 3.92% protein, and 13.7% TS). In contrast, 41.8% of cow milk samples were classified as N (3.64% fat, 3.37% protein, 12.42% TS), 41.2% as PQ (2.71% fat, 3.08% protein, and 10.6% TS), and 16.9% as HQ (5.46% fat, 4.01% protein, and 14.82% TS). The discriminant models for both river buffalo and cow milk were able to classify milk in the N and PQ groups with >90% accuracy, and that in the HQ group with >85% accuracy. 2019 artículo científico 0120-2952 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407660734005 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/407660734005.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/movil 10.15446/rfmvz.v66n1.79401 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=4076 Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia (Colombia) Num.1 Vol.66
title Characterization and classification of the compositional quality of milk from river buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and cows (Bos spp.) in Colombia
topic Veterinaria
Milk quality
multivariate analysis
river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407660734005
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/407660734005.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4076/407660734005/movil