Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Sociedad Química de México
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47531764021 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866585429632876544 |
|---|---|
| author | Yang-Yang Wu |
| author_facet | Yang-Yang Wu |
| contents | A Comparison of the Accuracy of Semi-empirical PM3, PDDG and PM6 methods in Predicting Heats of Formation for Organic Compounds Yang-Yang Wu Feng-Qi Zhao Xue-Hai Ju Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas) PM3 PM6 PDDG Key words linear fitting Gas phase heats of formation (HOF) of 18 kinds of 390 organic compounds were calculated by quantum chemical calculation using semi-empirical PM3, PDDG and PM6 methods. The calculated HOFs were compared with the experimental data to illustrate the ac - curacy for different kinds of organics. Furthermore, the calculated values were linearly fitted with experimental values using the least square method, and were afterward substituted into the fitted regres - sion equations to obtain the calibrated ones. The results show that, for 10 kinds of the selected organics, PM6 is more accurate, and PDDG is more accurate for 7 kinds of organics, while PM3 is only good for amino acid. As a whole, PM6 predicts the HOFs more accurately, with its weighted total mean average deviation (WTMAD) being 0.4 kJ/mol and 2.4 kJ/mol smaller than those of PM3 and PDDG, respectively. On the other hand, our results show that PDDG is the best to differentiate the isomers, with its mean average deviation (MAD) for isomerization energy being 7.8 kJ/mol and 11.0 kJ/mol smaller than PM6 and PM3, respectively. After the calibration, the values of MADs from the PM3, PDDG and PM6 results for most organics are reduced by 0.1 to 18.2 kJ/mol, with exceptions of the PM3 for amines, PDDG for carboxylic acids, and PM6 for ethers. 2014 artículo científico 1870-249X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47531764021 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=475 Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society application/pdf Sociedad Química de México Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society (México) Num.2 Vol.58 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_47531764021 |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Sociedad Química de México |
| spellingShingle | A Comparison of the Accuracy of Semi-empirical PM3, PDDG and PM6 methods in Predicting Heats of Formation for Organic Compounds Yang-Yang Wu Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas) PM3 PM6 PDDG Key words linear fitting A Comparison of the Accuracy of Semi-empirical PM3, PDDG and PM6 methods in Predicting Heats of Formation for Organic Compounds Yang-Yang Wu Feng-Qi Zhao Xue-Hai Ju Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas) PM3 PM6 PDDG Key words linear fitting Gas phase heats of formation (HOF) of 18 kinds of 390 organic compounds were calculated by quantum chemical calculation using semi-empirical PM3, PDDG and PM6 methods. The calculated HOFs were compared with the experimental data to illustrate the ac - curacy for different kinds of organics. Furthermore, the calculated values were linearly fitted with experimental values using the least square method, and were afterward substituted into the fitted regres - sion equations to obtain the calibrated ones. The results show that, for 10 kinds of the selected organics, PM6 is more accurate, and PDDG is more accurate for 7 kinds of organics, while PM3 is only good for amino acid. As a whole, PM6 predicts the HOFs more accurately, with its weighted total mean average deviation (WTMAD) being 0.4 kJ/mol and 2.4 kJ/mol smaller than those of PM3 and PDDG, respectively. On the other hand, our results show that PDDG is the best to differentiate the isomers, with its mean average deviation (MAD) for isomerization energy being 7.8 kJ/mol and 11.0 kJ/mol smaller than PM6 and PM3, respectively. After the calibration, the values of MADs from the PM3, PDDG and PM6 results for most organics are reduced by 0.1 to 18.2 kJ/mol, with exceptions of the PM3 for amines, PDDG for carboxylic acids, and PM6 for ethers. 2014 artículo científico 1870-249X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47531764021 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=475 Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society application/pdf Sociedad Química de México Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society (México) Num.2 Vol.58 |
| title | A Comparison of the Accuracy of Semi-empirical PM3, PDDG and PM6 methods in Predicting Heats of Formation for Organic Compounds |
| topic | Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas) PM3 PM6 PDDG Key words linear fitting |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47531764021 |