THERE IS NO LANGUAGE INSTINCT

Fuente: Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Geoffrey Sampson
Format: Artículo científico
Langue:en
Publié: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2007
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1876473481331212288
author Geoffrey Sampson
author_facet Geoffrey Sampson
contents THERE IS NO LANGUAGE INSTINCT Geoffrey Sampson Lengua y Literatura cultural evolution linguistic nativism grammar development Language acquisition This paper examines Steve Pinker’s arguments for the existence of a language instinct encoded in the genes of human beings as an explanation for the human language capacity. The analysis covers Pinker’s own arguments as well as those by Chomsky and by other authors in the nineties. All arguments in favour of a biologically-governed language capacity are refuted to show that, according to available evidence, there is no language instinct. The alternative view, namely, that language is a cultural artefact learned on the basis of a general capacity to formulate and test hypotheses, must be thus the best approach to understand language acquisition. 2007 artículo científico 2175-8026 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=478348690002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=4783 Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies application/pdf Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies (Brasil) Num.52
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_478348690002
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2007
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
spellingShingle THERE IS NO LANGUAGE INSTINCT
Geoffrey Sampson
Lengua y Literatura
cultural evolution
linguistic nativism
grammar development
Language acquisition
THERE IS NO LANGUAGE INSTINCT Geoffrey Sampson Lengua y Literatura cultural evolution linguistic nativism grammar development Language acquisition This paper examines Steve Pinker’s arguments for the existence of a language instinct encoded in the genes of human beings as an explanation for the human language capacity. The analysis covers Pinker’s own arguments as well as those by Chomsky and by other authors in the nineties. All arguments in favour of a biologically-governed language capacity are refuted to show that, according to available evidence, there is no language instinct. The alternative view, namely, that language is a cultural artefact learned on the basis of a general capacity to formulate and test hypotheses, must be thus the best approach to understand language acquisition. 2007 artículo científico 2175-8026 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=478348690002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=4783 Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies application/pdf Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies (Brasil) Num.52
title THERE IS NO LANGUAGE INSTINCT
topic Lengua y Literatura
cultural evolution
linguistic nativism
grammar development
Language acquisition
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=478348690002