Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery

Fuente: Redalyc · Ciencias Marinas

In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionally being fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with different installation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ciencias Marinas
1. Verfasser: Matt K. Broadhurst
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2004
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1878325298258247680
author Matt K. Broadhurst
author_facet Matt K. Broadhurst
collection Ciencias Marinas
container_title Ciencias Marinas
contents Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery Matt K. Broadhurst Damian J. Young Cristiana Damiano Ciencias de la Tierra grid prawn shrimp Nordmøre selectivity In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionallybeing fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with differentinstallation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative industry-developed, behavioral-type bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). Inexperiment 1, a conventional Nordmøre-grid (600 mm in length, installed at 45º) was compared against a longer grid (1200 mmin length, installed at 21º) and two locally-developed, behavioral-type BRDs. While slightly more difficult to operate than theconventional design, the longer Nordmøre-grid retained similar quantities of penaeids and bycatch; in contrast, both behavioraltypeBRDs retained significantly (up to five times) more bycatch and were considered ineffective for use in this fishery. Inexperiment 2, the conventional Nordmøre-grid was tested against three modified Nordmøre-grids, including a 600-mm-long gridwith a curved profile and installed at 45º, and two grids, both 900 mm in length and installed at 28º, but with flat and curvedprofiles. Only the curved 900-mm Nordmøre-grid caught significantly fewer penaeids and bycatch, although both of the curvedprofilegrids appeared to facilitate the release of debris from the trawl. The results are discussed in terms of fishery-specificfactors that probably contributed towards the performances of the various BRDs. 2004 artículo científico 0185-3880 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48003001 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=480 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas (México) Num.1B Vol.30
ctrlnum oai:cienciasmarinas.com.mx:article/111
10.7773/cm.v30i12.111
description In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionally being fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with different installation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative industry-developed, behavioral-type bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). In experiment 1, a conventional Nordmøre-grid (600 mm in length, installed at 45º) was compared against a longer grid (1200 mm in length, installed at 21º) and two locally-developed, behavioral-type BRDs. While slightly more difficult to operate than the conventional design, the longer Nordmøre-grid retained similar quantities of penaeids and bycatch; in contrast, both behavioraltype BRDs retained significantly (up to five times) more bycatch and were considered ineffective for use in this fishery. In experiment 2, the conventional Nordmøre-grid was tested against three modified Nordmøre-grids, including a 600-mm-long grid with a curved profile and installed at 45º, and two grids, both 900 mm in length and installed at 28º, but with flat and curved profiles. Only the curved 900-mm Nordmøre-grid caught significantly fewer penaeids and bycatch, although both of the curvedprofile grids appeared to facilitate the release of debris from the trawl. The results are discussed in terms of fishery-specific factors that probably contributed towards the performances of the various BRDs. En respuesta al reclamo de que las rejillas Nordmøre convencionales usadas en la pesquería de peneidos en el Río Clarence (NSW, Australia) se obstruían o bloqueaban durante las operaciones de pesca, se llevaron a cabo dos experimentos para examinar la eficacia de rejillas modificadas (con diferentes ángulos de instalación, tamaños y perfiles) y de dispositivos de tipo conductual para la reducción de la fauna acompañante desarrollados por la industria. En el experimento 1, se comparó una rejilla Nordmøre convencional (600 mm de longitud, instalada a 45º) con una rejilla Nordmøre más larga (1200 mm de longitud, instalada a 21º) y con dos dispositivos conductuales desarrollados localmente. Aunque ligeramente más difícil de operar que la rejilla Nordmøre convencional, la rejilla más larga retuvo cantidades similares de peneidos y fauna acompañante; sin embargo, los dos dispositivos conductuales retuvieron considerablemente más fauna acompañante (hasta cinco veces más), por lo que fueron considerados ineficaces para este tipo de pesquería. En el experimento 2, se comparó la rejilla Nordmøre convencional con tres rejillas Nordmøre modificadas: la primera de 600 mm de longitud con perfil curvo e instalada a 45º, y las otras dos de 900 mm de longitud e instaladas a 28º, pero una con perfil plano y la otra con perfil curvo. Sólo la rejilla Nordmøre de 900 mm y perfil curvo capturó significativamente menos peneidos y fauna acompañante; no obstante, ambas rejillas con perfil curvo parecían facilitar la descarga de basura de la red de arrastre. Se discuten los resultados considerando factores específicos de la pesquería que probablemente influyeron en el comportamiento de los diversos dispositivos utilizados.
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_48003001
institution Redalyc
Ciencias Marinas
language en
publishDate 2004
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
spelling Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery
Efectos de ángulos y perfiles de las rejillas Nordmøre, y otras modificaciones desarrolladas por la industria, sobre las capturas de una pesquería australiana de peneidos
Broadhurst, MK
Young, DJ
Damiano, C
bycatch reduction
shrimp
prawn
selectivity
Nordmøre-grid
reducción de la fauna acompañante
camarón
langostino
selectividad
rejilla Nordmøre
In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionally being fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with different installation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative industry-developed, behavioral-type bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). In experiment 1, a conventional Nordmøre-grid (600 mm in length, installed at 45º) was compared against a longer grid (1200 mm in length, installed at 21º) and two locally-developed, behavioral-type BRDs. While slightly more difficult to operate than the conventional design, the longer Nordmøre-grid retained similar quantities of penaeids and bycatch; in contrast, both behavioraltype BRDs retained significantly (up to five times) more bycatch and were considered ineffective for use in this fishery. In experiment 2, the conventional Nordmøre-grid was tested against three modified Nordmøre-grids, including a 600-mm-long grid with a curved profile and installed at 45º, and two grids, both 900 mm in length and installed at 28º, but with flat and curved profiles. Only the curved 900-mm Nordmøre-grid caught significantly fewer penaeids and bycatch, although both of the curvedprofile grids appeared to facilitate the release of debris from the trawl. The results are discussed in terms of fishery-specific factors that probably contributed towards the performances of the various BRDs.
En respuesta al reclamo de que las rejillas Nordmøre convencionales usadas en la pesquería de peneidos en el Río Clarence (NSW, Australia) se obstruían o bloqueaban durante las operaciones de pesca, se llevaron a cabo dos experimentos para examinar la eficacia de rejillas modificadas (con diferentes ángulos de instalación, tamaños y perfiles) y de dispositivos de tipo conductual para la reducción de la fauna acompañante desarrollados por la industria. En el experimento 1, se comparó una rejilla Nordmøre convencional (600 mm de longitud, instalada a 45º) con una rejilla Nordmøre más larga (1200 mm de longitud, instalada a 21º) y con dos dispositivos conductuales desarrollados localmente. Aunque ligeramente más difícil de operar que la rejilla Nordmøre convencional, la rejilla más larga retuvo cantidades similares de peneidos y fauna acompañante; sin embargo, los dos dispositivos conductuales retuvieron considerablemente más fauna acompañante (hasta cinco veces más), por lo que fueron considerados ineficaces para este tipo de pesquería. En el experimento 2, se comparó la rejilla Nordmøre convencional con tres rejillas Nordmøre modificadas: la primera de 600 mm de longitud con perfil curvo e instalada a 45º, y las otras dos de 900 mm de longitud e instaladas a 28º, pero una con perfil plano y la otra con perfil curvo. Sólo la rejilla Nordmøre de 900 mm y perfil curvo capturó significativamente menos peneidos y fauna acompañante; no obstante, ambas rejillas con perfil curvo parecían facilitar la descarga de basura de la red de arrastre. Se discuten los resultados considerando factores específicos de la pesquería que probablemente influyeron en el comportamiento de los diversos dispositivos utilizados.
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas
2004-03-06
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artículo Arbitrado
application/pdf
https://cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/111
10.7773/cm.v30i12.111
Ciencias Marinas; Vol. 30 No. 1B (2004); 155-168
Ciencias Marinas; Vol. 30 Núm. 1B (2004); 155-168
2395-9053
0185-3880
eng
https://cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/111/91
['Redalyc']
redalyc_48003001
Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery
['Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery', 'Matt K. Broadhurst', 'Ciencias de la Tierra', 'grid', 'prawn', 'shrimp', 'Nordmøre', 'selectivity', 'Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery Matt K. Broadhurst Damian J. Young Cristiana Damiano Ciencias de la Tierra grid prawn shrimp Nordmøre selectivity In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionallybeing fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with differentinstallation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative industry-developed, behavioral-type bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). Inexperiment 1, a conventional Nordmøre-grid (600 mm in length, installed at 45º) was compared against a longer grid (1200 mmin length, installed at 21º) and two locally-developed, behavioral-type BRDs. While slightly more difficult to operate than theconventional design, the longer Nordmøre-grid retained similar quantities of penaeids and bycatch; in contrast, both behavioraltypeBRDs retained significantly (up to five times) more bycatch and were considered ineffective for use in this fishery. Inexperiment 2, the conventional Nordmøre-grid was tested against three modified Nordmøre-grids, including a 600-mm-long gridwith a curved profile and installed at 45º, and two grids, both 900 mm in length and installed at 28º, but with flat and curvedprofiles. Only the curved 900-mm Nordmøre-grid caught significantly fewer penaeids and bycatch, although both of the curvedprofilegrids appeared to facilitate the release of debris from the trawl. The results are discussed in terms of fishery-specificfactors that probably contributed towards the performances of the various BRDs. 2004 artículo científico 0185-3880 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48003001 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=480 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas (México) Num.1B Vol.30']
['Matt K. Broadhurst']
['Matt K. Broadhurst']
['Artículo científico']
['2004']
['Universidad Autónoma de Baja California']
['en']
['Ciencias de la Tierra', 'grid', 'prawn', 'shrimp', 'Nordmøre', 'selectivity']
['https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48003001']
['Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery Matt K. Broadhurst Damian J. Young Cristiana Damiano Ciencias de la Tierra grid prawn shrimp Nordmøre selectivity In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionallybeing fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with differentinstallation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative industry-developed, behavioral-type bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). Inexperiment 1, a conventional Nordmøre-grid (600 mm in length, installed at 45º) was compared against a longer grid (1200 mmin length, installed at 21º) and two locally-developed, behavioral-type BRDs. While slightly more difficult to operate than theconventional design, the longer Nordmøre-grid retained similar quantities of penaeids and bycatch; in contrast, both behavioraltypeBRDs retained significantly (up to five times) more bycatch and were considered ineffective for use in this fishery. Inexperiment 2, the conventional Nordmøre-grid was tested against three modified Nordmøre-grids, including a 600-mm-long gridwith a curved profile and installed at 45º, and two grids, both 900 mm in length and installed at 28º, but with flat and curvedprofiles. Only the curved 900-mm Nordmøre-grid caught significantly fewer penaeids and bycatch, although both of the curvedprofilegrids appeared to facilitate the release of debris from the trawl. The results are discussed in terms of fishery-specificfactors that probably contributed towards the performances of the various BRDs. 2004 artículo científico 0185-3880 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48003001 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=480 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas (México) Num.1B Vol.30']
spellingShingle Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery
Matt K. Broadhurst
Ciencias de la Tierra
grid
prawn
shrimp
Nordmøre
selectivity
Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery Matt K. Broadhurst Damian J. Young Cristiana Damiano Ciencias de la Tierra grid prawn shrimp Nordmøre selectivity In response to claims that conventional Nordmøre-grids used in the Clarence River penaeid-trawl fishery were occasionallybeing fouled or blocked during fishing, two experiments were done to examine the utility of modified grids with differentinstallation angles, sizes and profiles, and alternative industry-developed, behavioral-type bycatch reduction devices (BRDs). Inexperiment 1, a conventional Nordmøre-grid (600 mm in length, installed at 45º) was compared against a longer grid (1200 mmin length, installed at 21º) and two locally-developed, behavioral-type BRDs. While slightly more difficult to operate than theconventional design, the longer Nordmøre-grid retained similar quantities of penaeids and bycatch; in contrast, both behavioraltypeBRDs retained significantly (up to five times) more bycatch and were considered ineffective for use in this fishery. Inexperiment 2, the conventional Nordmøre-grid was tested against three modified Nordmøre-grids, including a 600-mm-long gridwith a curved profile and installed at 45º, and two grids, both 900 mm in length and installed at 28º, but with flat and curvedprofiles. Only the curved 900-mm Nordmøre-grid caught significantly fewer penaeids and bycatch, although both of the curvedprofilegrids appeared to facilitate the release of debris from the trawl. The results are discussed in terms of fishery-specificfactors that probably contributed towards the performances of the various BRDs. 2004 artículo científico 0185-3880 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48003001 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=480 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas (México) Num.1B Vol.30
title Effects of Nordmøre-grid angles, profiles and other industry-developed modifications on catches in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery
title_alt Efectos de ángulos y perfiles de las rejillas Nordmøre, y otras modificaciones desarrolladas por la industria, sobre las capturas de una pesquería australiana de peneidos
topic Ciencias de la Tierra
grid
prawn
shrimp
Nordmøre
selectivity
topic_facet bycatch reduction
shrimp
prawn
selectivity
Nordmøre-grid
reducción de la fauna acompañante
camarón
langostino
selectividad
rejilla Nordmøre
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48003001
https://cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/111