Abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria, hydrographic parameters and the possible underestimation of in situ chlorophyll a in the northern gulf of california and the mexican california current

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Helmut Maske
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876448727874404352
author Helmut Maske
author_facet Helmut Maske
contents Abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria, hydrographic parameters and the possible underestimation of in situ chlorophyll a in the northern gulf of california and the mexican california current Helmut Maske Cecilia Díaz Ciencias de la Tierra nutrients picoplankton chlorophyll a Gulf of California California Current The abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria was counted within the euphotic zone at a station in DelfínBasin, in the northern Gulf of California, and at a station in the California Current, off Todos Santos Bay,during 1993. The abundance of cyanobacteria at both stations was between 107 and 108 cells L–1.Comparison with other concomitantly sampled parameters, i.e., irradiance, temperature, nutrients andchlorophyll a, showed no significant correlation with the cyanobacterial abundance. The contribution ofcyanobacteria to the total in situ chlorophyll a concentration was calculated using the cyanobacterialabundance, an average published value of 1.0fgChl a cell–1 and a reduced pigment extraction efficiencyin cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria contributed, in half of the cases, more than 10% and more than 4% ofthe total chlorophyll in Delfín Basin and the California Current, respectively. Again, this relativecontribution was not related to the other concomitantly measured in situ parameters. In Synechococcus(WH-7803) cultures, the cellular chlorophyll a concentration was measured after extraction by soakingthe samples in different solvents: 90% acetone and dimethylsulfoxide/acetone/water (DMSO/acetone).The cellular chlorophyll of WH-7803 extracted with DMSO/acetone was a factor of 1.9 times higher thanthe cellular chlorophyll concentration extracted with 90% acetone without sonication. Assuming that onlythe cyanobacteria would yield higher chlorophyll concentrations with DMSO/acetone extraction, then thechlorophyll a concentrations measured with 90% acetone extraction without sonication underestimated,in half of the cases, the real concentrations of in situ chlorophyll a by more than 5% in the northern Gulfof California and more than 2% in the California Current. 2000 artículo científico 0185-3880 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48026304 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=480 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas (México) Num.3 Vol.26
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_48026304
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2000
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
spellingShingle Abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria, hydrographic parameters and the possible underestimation of in situ chlorophyll a in the northern gulf of california and the mexican california current
Helmut Maske
Ciencias de la Tierra
nutrients
picoplankton
chlorophyll a
Gulf of California
California Current
Abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria, hydrographic parameters and the possible underestimation of in situ chlorophyll a in the northern gulf of california and the mexican california current Helmut Maske Cecilia Díaz Ciencias de la Tierra nutrients picoplankton chlorophyll a Gulf of California California Current The abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria was counted within the euphotic zone at a station in DelfínBasin, in the northern Gulf of California, and at a station in the California Current, off Todos Santos Bay,during 1993. The abundance of cyanobacteria at both stations was between 107 and 108 cells L–1.Comparison with other concomitantly sampled parameters, i.e., irradiance, temperature, nutrients andchlorophyll a, showed no significant correlation with the cyanobacterial abundance. The contribution ofcyanobacteria to the total in situ chlorophyll a concentration was calculated using the cyanobacterialabundance, an average published value of 1.0fgChl a cell–1 and a reduced pigment extraction efficiencyin cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria contributed, in half of the cases, more than 10% and more than 4% ofthe total chlorophyll in Delfín Basin and the California Current, respectively. Again, this relativecontribution was not related to the other concomitantly measured in situ parameters. In Synechococcus(WH-7803) cultures, the cellular chlorophyll a concentration was measured after extraction by soakingthe samples in different solvents: 90% acetone and dimethylsulfoxide/acetone/water (DMSO/acetone).The cellular chlorophyll of WH-7803 extracted with DMSO/acetone was a factor of 1.9 times higher thanthe cellular chlorophyll concentration extracted with 90% acetone without sonication. Assuming that onlythe cyanobacteria would yield higher chlorophyll concentrations with DMSO/acetone extraction, then thechlorophyll a concentrations measured with 90% acetone extraction without sonication underestimated,in half of the cases, the real concentrations of in situ chlorophyll a by more than 5% in the northern Gulfof California and more than 2% in the California Current. 2000 artículo científico 0185-3880 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48026304 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=480 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas (México) Num.3 Vol.26
title Abundance of coccoid cyanobacteria, hydrographic parameters and the possible underestimation of in situ chlorophyll a in the northern gulf of california and the mexican california current
topic Ciencias de la Tierra
nutrients
picoplankton
chlorophyll a
Gulf of California
California Current
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48026304