WHY THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD. AND WHY IT IS NOT A PROBLEM
Fuente:
Redalyc
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo científico |
| Lenguaje: | en |
| Publicado: |
Universitat de València
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1876453211725889536 |
|---|---|
| author | Jean Bricmont |
| author_facet | Jean Bricmont |
| contents | WHY THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD. AND WHY IT IS NOT A PROBLEM Jean Bricmont Comunicación Epistemology demarcation line defense of common sense This article briefl y reviews and criticizes various strategies that have been proposed by philosophers of science in order to establish a distinction between science and non-science. It also proposes a more modest, but easier, way to make such a distinction. Throughout this text I will fi rst address the problems of the demarcation criteria of the philosophy of science during the fi rst half of the twentieth century; then, I will defend that they absolutely do not justify the radical conclusions reached during the second half of the century. 2015 artículo científico 2174-3487 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511751360025 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5117 Mètode Science Studies Journal application/pdf Universitat de València Mètode Science Studies Journal (España) Num.5 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_511751360025 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Universitat de València |
| spellingShingle | WHY THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD. AND WHY IT IS NOT A PROBLEM Jean Bricmont Comunicación Epistemology demarcation line defense of common sense WHY THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD. AND WHY IT IS NOT A PROBLEM Jean Bricmont Comunicación Epistemology demarcation line defense of common sense This article briefl y reviews and criticizes various strategies that have been proposed by philosophers of science in order to establish a distinction between science and non-science. It also proposes a more modest, but easier, way to make such a distinction. Throughout this text I will fi rst address the problems of the demarcation criteria of the philosophy of science during the fi rst half of the twentieth century; then, I will defend that they absolutely do not justify the radical conclusions reached during the second half of the century. 2015 artículo científico 2174-3487 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511751360025 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5117 Mètode Science Studies Journal application/pdf Universitat de València Mètode Science Studies Journal (España) Num.5 |
| title | WHY THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD. AND WHY IT IS NOT A PROBLEM |
| topic | Comunicación Epistemology demarcation line defense of common sense |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511751360025 |