Why isn’t Mexico on China’s Growth Path?

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Gerber
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Portal Universia S.A. 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876463296430735360
author James Gerber
author_facet James Gerber
contents Why isn’t Mexico on China’s Growth Path? James Gerber Economía y Finanzas China Mexico location institutions economic growth A growth accounting framework is used with data from the Penn World Table to disaggregate and compare economic growth in Mexico and China, 1953-2007. China surpasses Mexico in both the accumulation of physical capital and the growth of total factor productivity, implying that high savings rates are partially responsible for the growth differences, but additional forces are also important. The catalog of potential variables is lengthy; this paper concentrates on geography (location) and institutions. In particular, the ability of Chinese state and local officials to support economic growth is striking. 2012 artículo científico 1988-7116 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511851332007 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5118 Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability / Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad / Revista de Globalização, Competitividade e Governabilidade application/pdf Portal Universia S.A. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability / Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad / Revista de Globalização, Competitividade e Governabilidade (España) Num.1 Vol.6
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_511851332007
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2012
publisher Portal Universia S.A.
spellingShingle Why isn’t Mexico on China’s Growth Path?
James Gerber
Economía y Finanzas
China
Mexico
location
institutions
economic growth
Why isn’t Mexico on China’s Growth Path? James Gerber Economía y Finanzas China Mexico location institutions economic growth A growth accounting framework is used with data from the Penn World Table to disaggregate and compare economic growth in Mexico and China, 1953-2007. China surpasses Mexico in both the accumulation of physical capital and the growth of total factor productivity, implying that high savings rates are partially responsible for the growth differences, but additional forces are also important. The catalog of potential variables is lengthy; this paper concentrates on geography (location) and institutions. In particular, the ability of Chinese state and local officials to support economic growth is striking. 2012 artículo científico 1988-7116 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511851332007 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5118 Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability / Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad / Revista de Globalização, Competitividade e Governabilidade application/pdf Portal Universia S.A. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability / Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad / Revista de Globalização, Competitividade e Governabilidade (España) Num.1 Vol.6
title Why isn’t Mexico on China’s Growth Path?
topic Economía y Finanzas
China
Mexico
location
institutions
economic growth
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511851332007