Risks, totems, and fetishes in Marx and Freud

Fuente: Redalyc
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Geoffrey R. Skoll
Natura: Artículo científico
Lingua:en
Pubblicazione: Universidad de Guadalajara 2012
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1876423368236859392
author Geoffrey R. Skoll
author_facet Geoffrey R. Skoll
contents Risks, totems, and fetishes in Marx and Freud Geoffrey R. Skoll Korstanje Maximiliano E. Filosofía Marx risk Crime Freud fetish This essay was inspired by and elaborates on several ideas in Maximiliano Korstanje’s (2011; 2012) contribution on a model of risk. Korstanje points out that risks are not probabilities of hazards, dangers, or losses, but narratives serving to modify human behavior. He raises several areas of behavior as illustrations: terrorism, automobiles, and local, interpersonal crime. Finally, his paper cites the contributions of Sigmund Freud and other theorists on totems, taboos, and by extension fetishes. Also following Korstanje (2011; 2012), risks were primarily understood in economic terms, especially in a capitalist political economy. My elaboration seizes on these ideas as they were addressed by Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Risk, as a discourse, not only paves the ways for circulating some goods in some directions, but also prevents the circulation of others. As a result of this, it allows the monopolization of power in aristocracies. 2012 artículo científico 1562-384X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=513851806003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5138 Sincronía application/pdf Universidad de Guadalajara Sincronía (México) Num.62
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_513851806003
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2012
publisher Universidad de Guadalajara
spellingShingle Risks, totems, and fetishes in Marx and Freud
Geoffrey R. Skoll
Filosofía
Marx
risk
Crime
Freud
fetish
Risks, totems, and fetishes in Marx and Freud Geoffrey R. Skoll Korstanje Maximiliano E. Filosofía Marx risk Crime Freud fetish This essay was inspired by and elaborates on several ideas in Maximiliano Korstanje’s (2011; 2012) contribution on a model of risk. Korstanje points out that risks are not probabilities of hazards, dangers, or losses, but narratives serving to modify human behavior. He raises several areas of behavior as illustrations: terrorism, automobiles, and local, interpersonal crime. Finally, his paper cites the contributions of Sigmund Freud and other theorists on totems, taboos, and by extension fetishes. Also following Korstanje (2011; 2012), risks were primarily understood in economic terms, especially in a capitalist political economy. My elaboration seizes on these ideas as they were addressed by Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Risk, as a discourse, not only paves the ways for circulating some goods in some directions, but also prevents the circulation of others. As a result of this, it allows the monopolization of power in aristocracies. 2012 artículo científico 1562-384X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=513851806003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5138 Sincronía application/pdf Universidad de Guadalajara Sincronía (México) Num.62
title Risks, totems, and fetishes in Marx and Freud
topic Filosofía
Marx
risk
Crime
Freud
fetish
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=513851806003