Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Universidade de São Paulo
2020
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876438905779126272 |
|---|---|
| author | Suzi Elen Ferreira Dias |
| author_facet | Suzi Elen Ferreira Dias |
| contents | Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda Suzi Elen Ferreira Dias Edson Sadao Iizuka Eduardo Pinto Vilas Boas Administración y Contabilidad Research agenda Literature review Academic production Effectuation limitations PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand the theoretical discussion of effectuation since the seminal paper in 2001 and to propose an agenda for future studies.Design/methodology/approachSystematic literature review and content analysis of 71 papers.FindingsMost papers performed a replication of the concepts empirically, and few studies proposed to understand theoretical aspects of effectuation, among them, some authors presented theoretical advances to improve the approach and others participated in an ongoing debate that shows there is no consensus on whether the approach is theory or if considered, appears to be under construction at a rudimentary level or being questioned.Research limitations/implicationsThe method requires authors to make choices, so the database used and the criteria defined for searching papers that were analyzed are the main limitations of this research.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest that researchers, teachers and practitioners use effectuation analytically and reflectively.Social implicationsThe authors present and analyze the current theoretical debate on effectuation. Results suggest the need for new discussions about the concepts, as well as new theoretical efforts of the researchers to analyze the potentialities and limitations of this approach.Originality/valueAmong empirical and applied research, with replications of the concepts of effectuation, this research contributes to a theoretical discussion based on a systematic literature review, seeking to bring new reflections about this approach. Additionally, the authors present an agenda of theoretical gaps for the development of future research. 2020 artículo científico 2515-8961 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=537562599003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/537562599003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5375 Innovation & Management Review application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo Innovation & Management Review (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.17 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_537562599003 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Universidade de São Paulo |
| spellingShingle | Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda Suzi Elen Ferreira Dias Administración y Contabilidad Research agenda Literature review Academic production Effectuation limitations Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda Suzi Elen Ferreira Dias Edson Sadao Iizuka Eduardo Pinto Vilas Boas Administración y Contabilidad Research agenda Literature review Academic production Effectuation limitations PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand the theoretical discussion of effectuation since the seminal paper in 2001 and to propose an agenda for future studies.Design/methodology/approachSystematic literature review and content analysis of 71 papers.FindingsMost papers performed a replication of the concepts empirically, and few studies proposed to understand theoretical aspects of effectuation, among them, some authors presented theoretical advances to improve the approach and others participated in an ongoing debate that shows there is no consensus on whether the approach is theory or if considered, appears to be under construction at a rudimentary level or being questioned.Research limitations/implicationsThe method requires authors to make choices, so the database used and the criteria defined for searching papers that were analyzed are the main limitations of this research.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest that researchers, teachers and practitioners use effectuation analytically and reflectively.Social implicationsThe authors present and analyze the current theoretical debate on effectuation. Results suggest the need for new discussions about the concepts, as well as new theoretical efforts of the researchers to analyze the potentialities and limitations of this approach.Originality/valueAmong empirical and applied research, with replications of the concepts of effectuation, this research contributes to a theoretical discussion based on a systematic literature review, seeking to bring new reflections about this approach. Additionally, the authors present an agenda of theoretical gaps for the development of future research. 2020 artículo científico 2515-8961 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=537562599003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/537562599003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5375 Innovation & Management Review application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo Innovation & Management Review (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.17 |
| title | Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda |
| topic | Administración y Contabilidad Research agenda Literature review Academic production Effectuation limitations |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=537562599003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/537562599003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5375/537562599003/movil |