Wikipedia's Role in Reputation Management: An Analysis of the Best and Worst Companies in the USA

Fuente: Redalyc
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Marcia W. DiStaso
Natura: Artículo científico
Lingua:en
Pubblicazione: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya 2012
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1876489892596285440
author Marcia W. DiStaso
author_facet Marcia W. DiStaso
contents Wikipedia's Role in Reputation Management: An Analysis of the Best and Worst Companies in the USA Marcia W. DiStaso Marcus Messner Estudios Culturales USA monitor Wikipedia social media reputation management Being considered one of the best companies in the USA is a great honor, but this reputation does not exempt businesses from negativity in the collaboratively edited online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Content analysis of corporate Wikipedia articles for companies with the best and worst reputations in the USA revealed that negative content outweighed positive content irrespective of reputation. It was found that both the best and the worst companies had more negative than positive content in Wikipedia. This is an important issue because Wikipedia is not only one of the most popular websites in the world, but is also often the first place people look when seeking corporate information. Although there was more content on corporate social responsibility in the entries for the ten companies with the best reputations, this was still overshadowed by content referring to legal issues or scandals. Ultimately, public relations professionals need to regularly monitor and request updates to their corporate Wikipedia articles regardless of what kind of company they work for. 2012 artículo científico 1575-2275 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55023345002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=550 Digithum application/pdf Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Digithum (España) Num.14
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_55023345002
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2012
publisher Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
spellingShingle Wikipedia's Role in Reputation Management: An Analysis of the Best and Worst Companies in the USA
Marcia W. DiStaso
Estudios Culturales
USA
monitor
Wikipedia
social media
reputation management
Wikipedia's Role in Reputation Management: An Analysis of the Best and Worst Companies in the USA Marcia W. DiStaso Marcus Messner Estudios Culturales USA monitor Wikipedia social media reputation management Being considered one of the best companies in the USA is a great honor, but this reputation does not exempt businesses from negativity in the collaboratively edited online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Content analysis of corporate Wikipedia articles for companies with the best and worst reputations in the USA revealed that negative content outweighed positive content irrespective of reputation. It was found that both the best and the worst companies had more negative than positive content in Wikipedia. This is an important issue because Wikipedia is not only one of the most popular websites in the world, but is also often the first place people look when seeking corporate information. Although there was more content on corporate social responsibility in the entries for the ten companies with the best reputations, this was still overshadowed by content referring to legal issues or scandals. Ultimately, public relations professionals need to regularly monitor and request updates to their corporate Wikipedia articles regardless of what kind of company they work for. 2012 artículo científico 1575-2275 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55023345002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=550 Digithum application/pdf Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Digithum (España) Num.14
title Wikipedia's Role in Reputation Management: An Analysis of the Best and Worst Companies in the USA
topic Estudios Culturales
USA
monitor
Wikipedia
social media
reputation management
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55023345002