Tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Fábio de Oliveira Lucena
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Universidade de São Paulo 2020
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876474901063270400
author Fábio de Oliveira Lucena
author_facet Fábio de Oliveira Lucena
contents Tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process Fábio de Oliveira Lucena Silvio Popadiuk Administración y Contabilidad making Evaluation Tacit knowledge Strategic decisions Unstructured decision Purpose- This paper aims to identify the expressions and flows of tacit knowledge in the unstructured decision process. In this type of process, decision-makers use not only the explicit knowledge but also aspects such as intuition, experience and other forms of tacit knowledge. The research developed a qualitative approach, through a study of multiple cases, and applied semi-structured interviews to ten executives. The analysis of data was carried out according to Flores (1994) interpretative analysis of text technique. Results indicated that there was the insertion of tacit knowledge in all unstructured decision-making routines. It was also detected the need to explicitly add the routine of evaluation to the Mintzberg et al.’s (1976) model as elements of tacit knowledge were also identified at this stage of the decision-making process.Design/methodology/approach- The research has taken a qualitative approach, through a study of multiple cases, applying semi-structured interviews to ten executives. The analysis of data was carried out according to technique for interpretative analysis of the text.Findings- Results indicated that there was tacit knowledge in all unstructured decision-making routines. Also detected was the need to explicitly add the routine of evaluation to the model.Research limitations/implications- It was unable to perform psychological studies to investigate the deepest cognitive and emotional aspects of managers, and it does not address, in depth, some issues that are related to tacit knowledge in decisions and that would be considered relevant.Practical implications- Although this research was unable to dissect the composition of tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process, a better understanding of the aspects that make up the knowledge in question has been developed, providing some decision-making guidelines to managers.Social implications- The language between communications actors can share decision-making rules to assist in the production and process of arguments necessary for the debate, evaluation and attribution of institutionally recurrent decisions.Originality/value- The original contribution is present in a detailed description of the expressions of flows of tacit knowledge in unstructured decision-making processes, based on the model of Mintzberg et al. (1976). From the influence of tacit knowledge, it was found that the model in question needs to consider the relevance of the evaluation phase, as a stage equivalent to the other described by Mintzberg et al. (1976). These aspects have been better explained in the introduction and conclusion. Participant observation was not possible because the decision had already been taken by the informant at the moment of the interviews. 2020 artículo científico 2531-0488 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=553862552003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/553862552003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5538 RAUSP Management Journal application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo RAUSP Management Journal (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.55
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_553862552003
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2020
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
spellingShingle Tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process
Fábio de Oliveira Lucena
Administración y Contabilidad
making
Evaluation
Tacit knowledge
Strategic decisions
Unstructured decision
Tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process Fábio de Oliveira Lucena Silvio Popadiuk Administración y Contabilidad making Evaluation Tacit knowledge Strategic decisions Unstructured decision Purpose- This paper aims to identify the expressions and flows of tacit knowledge in the unstructured decision process. In this type of process, decision-makers use not only the explicit knowledge but also aspects such as intuition, experience and other forms of tacit knowledge. The research developed a qualitative approach, through a study of multiple cases, and applied semi-structured interviews to ten executives. The analysis of data was carried out according to Flores (1994) interpretative analysis of text technique. Results indicated that there was the insertion of tacit knowledge in all unstructured decision-making routines. It was also detected the need to explicitly add the routine of evaluation to the Mintzberg et al.’s (1976) model as elements of tacit knowledge were also identified at this stage of the decision-making process.Design/methodology/approach- The research has taken a qualitative approach, through a study of multiple cases, applying semi-structured interviews to ten executives. The analysis of data was carried out according to technique for interpretative analysis of the text.Findings- Results indicated that there was tacit knowledge in all unstructured decision-making routines. Also detected was the need to explicitly add the routine of evaluation to the model.Research limitations/implications- It was unable to perform psychological studies to investigate the deepest cognitive and emotional aspects of managers, and it does not address, in depth, some issues that are related to tacit knowledge in decisions and that would be considered relevant.Practical implications- Although this research was unable to dissect the composition of tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process, a better understanding of the aspects that make up the knowledge in question has been developed, providing some decision-making guidelines to managers.Social implications- The language between communications actors can share decision-making rules to assist in the production and process of arguments necessary for the debate, evaluation and attribution of institutionally recurrent decisions.Originality/value- The original contribution is present in a detailed description of the expressions of flows of tacit knowledge in unstructured decision-making processes, based on the model of Mintzberg et al. (1976). From the influence of tacit knowledge, it was found that the model in question needs to consider the relevance of the evaluation phase, as a stage equivalent to the other described by Mintzberg et al. (1976). These aspects have been better explained in the introduction and conclusion. Participant observation was not possible because the decision had already been taken by the informant at the moment of the interviews. 2020 artículo científico 2531-0488 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=553862552003 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/553862552003.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=5538 RAUSP Management Journal application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo RAUSP Management Journal (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.55
title Tacit knowledge in unstructured decision process
topic Administración y Contabilidad
making
Evaluation
Tacit knowledge
Strategic decisions
Unstructured decision
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=553862552003
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/553862552003.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5538/553862552003/movil