Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent
Fuente:
Redalyc
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Universidad de Chile
2005
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1876484962695249920 |
|---|---|
| author | Gillian Bartlett |
| author_facet | Gillian Bartlett |
| contents | Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent Gillian Bartlett Robyn M. Tamblyn Yuko Kawasumi Lise Poissant Laurel Taylor Filosofía non informed consent participation bias electronic prescribing primary care physicians Electronic prescribing potentially reduces adverse outcomes and provides critical information for drug safetyresearch but studies may be distorted by non-participation bias. 52,507 patients and 28 physicians were evaluated todetermine characteristics associated with consent status in an electronic prescribing project. Physicians with lesstechnology proficiency, seeing more patients, and having patients with higher fragmentation of care were less likely toobtain consent. Older patients with complex health status, higher income, and more visits to the study physician weremore likely to consent. These systematic differences could result in significant non-participation bias for researchconducted only with consenting patients. 2005 artículo científico 0717-5906 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=554 Acta Bioethica application/pdf Universidad de Chile Acta Bioethica (Chile) Num.2 Vol.11 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_55411205 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publisher | Universidad de Chile |
| spellingShingle | Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent Gillian Bartlett Filosofía non informed consent participation bias electronic prescribing primary care physicians Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent Gillian Bartlett Robyn M. Tamblyn Yuko Kawasumi Lise Poissant Laurel Taylor Filosofía non informed consent participation bias electronic prescribing primary care physicians Electronic prescribing potentially reduces adverse outcomes and provides critical information for drug safetyresearch but studies may be distorted by non-participation bias. 52,507 patients and 28 physicians were evaluated todetermine characteristics associated with consent status in an electronic prescribing project. Physicians with lesstechnology proficiency, seeing more patients, and having patients with higher fragmentation of care were less likely toobtain consent. Older patients with complex health status, higher income, and more visits to the study physician weremore likely to consent. These systematic differences could result in significant non-participation bias for researchconducted only with consenting patients. 2005 artículo científico 0717-5906 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=554 Acta Bioethica application/pdf Universidad de Chile Acta Bioethica (Chile) Num.2 Vol.11 |
| title | Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent |
| topic | Filosofía non informed consent participation bias electronic prescribing primary care physicians |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205 |