Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gillian Bartlett
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad de Chile 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866817155251568640
author Gillian Bartlett
author_facet Gillian Bartlett
contents Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent Gillian Bartlett Robyn M. Tamblyn Yuko Kawasumi Lise Poissant Laurel Taylor Filosofía non informed consent participation bias electronic prescribing primary care physicians Electronic prescribing potentially reduces adverse outcomes and provides critical information for drug safetyresearch but studies may be distorted by non-participation bias. 52,507 patients and 28 physicians were evaluated todetermine characteristics associated with consent status in an electronic prescribing project. Physicians with lesstechnology proficiency, seeing more patients, and having patients with higher fragmentation of care were less likely toobtain consent. Older patients with complex health status, higher income, and more visits to the study physician weremore likely to consent. These systematic differences could result in significant non-participation bias for researchconducted only with consenting patients. 2005 artículo científico 0717-5906 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=554 Acta Bioethica application/pdf Universidad de Chile Acta Bioethica (Chile) Num.2 Vol.11
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_55411205
language en
publishDate 2005
publisher Universidad de Chile
spellingShingle Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent
Gillian Bartlett
Filosofía
non
informed consent
participation bias
electronic prescribing
primary care physicians
Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent Gillian Bartlett Robyn M. Tamblyn Yuko Kawasumi Lise Poissant Laurel Taylor Filosofía non informed consent participation bias electronic prescribing primary care physicians Electronic prescribing potentially reduces adverse outcomes and provides critical information for drug safetyresearch but studies may be distorted by non-participation bias. 52,507 patients and 28 physicians were evaluated todetermine characteristics associated with consent status in an electronic prescribing project. Physicians with lesstechnology proficiency, seeing more patients, and having patients with higher fragmentation of care were less likely toobtain consent. Older patients with complex health status, higher income, and more visits to the study physician weremore likely to consent. These systematic differences could result in significant non-participation bias for researchconducted only with consenting patients. 2005 artículo científico 0717-5906 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=554 Acta Bioethica application/pdf Universidad de Chile Acta Bioethica (Chile) Num.2 Vol.11
title Non-participation bias in health services research using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent
topic Filosofía
non
informed consent
participation bias
electronic prescribing
primary care physicians
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55411205