WHO SHOULD BE A PARENT? PARENTHOOD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE
Fuente:
Redalyc
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Universidad de Chile
2017
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1876478221963231232 |
|---|---|
| author | Claire Junga Kim |
| author_facet | Claire Junga Kim |
| contents | WHO SHOULD BE A PARENT? PARENTHOOD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE Claire Junga Kim Filosofía Parents reproduction parenthood status reproductive technology assisted reproductive techniques The various reproductive technologies have expanded the power people have to control their bodily function. Because these technologies have brought new configurations of people whose role is central to the reproductive process, ambiguities about the attribution of parenthood have emerged. I insist that the intentional account among four explanatory frameworks for parenthood gains more validity, as opportunities to exert intention increase. I extend the intentional account, using Scanlon’s explanation of the “Value of Choice.” In the Value of Choice, Scanlon explains that choice has a justificatory power; that is, by the fact of having choice, one accepts the normative consequences of one’s decision. The current changes in reproduction technologies mean that there are several conditions to choose. While maintaining justificatory power from the Value of Choice, the intentional account becomes inclusive enough to encompass the status quo, plausible even in situations where intention does not exist or is not exerted. 2017 artículo científico 0717-5906 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55452865015 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=554 Acta Bioethica application/pdf Universidad de Chile Acta Bioethica (Chile) Num.1 Vol.23 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_55452865015 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Universidad de Chile |
| spellingShingle | WHO SHOULD BE A PARENT? PARENTHOOD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE Claire Junga Kim Filosofía Parents reproduction parenthood status reproductive technology assisted reproductive techniques WHO SHOULD BE A PARENT? PARENTHOOD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE Claire Junga Kim Filosofía Parents reproduction parenthood status reproductive technology assisted reproductive techniques The various reproductive technologies have expanded the power people have to control their bodily function. Because these technologies have brought new configurations of people whose role is central to the reproductive process, ambiguities about the attribution of parenthood have emerged. I insist that the intentional account among four explanatory frameworks for parenthood gains more validity, as opportunities to exert intention increase. I extend the intentional account, using Scanlon’s explanation of the “Value of Choice.” In the Value of Choice, Scanlon explains that choice has a justificatory power; that is, by the fact of having choice, one accepts the normative consequences of one’s decision. The current changes in reproduction technologies mean that there are several conditions to choose. While maintaining justificatory power from the Value of Choice, the intentional account becomes inclusive enough to encompass the status quo, plausible even in situations where intention does not exist or is not exerted. 2017 artículo científico 0717-5906 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55452865015 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=554 Acta Bioethica application/pdf Universidad de Chile Acta Bioethica (Chile) Num.1 Vol.23 |
| title | WHO SHOULD BE A PARENT? PARENTHOOD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE |
| topic | Filosofía Parents reproduction parenthood status reproductive technology assisted reproductive techniques |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55452865015 |