Seguridad clínica de la Dexmedetomidina en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: JR Aguilar
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Sociedad Venezolana de Farmacología Clínica y Terapéutica 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876428327693058048
author JR Aguilar
author_facet JR Aguilar
contents Seguridad clínica de la Dexmedetomidina en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático JR Aguilar ML Elbayeh O Bayeh S Bayeh YR Artigas Medicina Nerve block Dexmedetomidine Levobupivacaine Neuropathic pain Neuropathic pain is defined as that which is caused by either a primary injury or dysfunction in the nervous system. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, parallel group, comparative clinical trial, where adult patients (n=40) with a clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain were screened and selected for admission in the trial. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients, n=20, were administered lidocaine 1%, 70 mg and levobupivacaine 5 mg, both locally; Group B patients, n= 20, were locally administered lidocaine 1%, 70 mg, levobupivacaine 5 mg, and dexmedetomidine at 3 μg/kg/dose. Sympathetic and peripheral blocks were made to each patient, according to the specific clinical picture and neuropathic pain localization. Pre-block-assessed parameters were again determined 1 and 5 minutes after finalizing the anesthetic procedure. Adverse events, either spontaneously reported or obtained through open questions, were also determined. Results: Tolerability assessment resulted in 42.5% of overall patients not reporting treatment-related adverse events, and again when comparing both groups, those receiving dexmedetomidine reported adverse events less frequently (50%) than Group A patients (35%). Conclusions: We conclude that, besides its sedative properties, dexmedetomidine together with local anesthetics showed excellent analgesia-enhancing effects, with the additional benefit of a favorable side-effect profile, lacking respiratory-depressant actions and improving overall patient management. In addition, patients receiving dexmedetomidine showed changes in heart rate and blood pressure that were both predictable and stable during and after the anesthetic procedures, while the patient achieved anxiolysis, improving his tolerance to the procedure itself 2004 artículo científico 0798-0264 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55923106 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=559 Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica application/pdf Sociedad Venezolana de Farmacología Clínica y Terapéutica Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica (República Bolivariana de Venezuela) Num.1 Vol.23
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_55923106
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2004
publisher Sociedad Venezolana de Farmacología Clínica y Terapéutica
spellingShingle Seguridad clínica de la Dexmedetomidina en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático
JR Aguilar
Medicina
Nerve block
Dexmedetomidine
Levobupivacaine
Neuropathic pain
Seguridad clínica de la Dexmedetomidina en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático JR Aguilar ML Elbayeh O Bayeh S Bayeh YR Artigas Medicina Nerve block Dexmedetomidine Levobupivacaine Neuropathic pain Neuropathic pain is defined as that which is caused by either a primary injury or dysfunction in the nervous system. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, parallel group, comparative clinical trial, where adult patients (n=40) with a clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain were screened and selected for admission in the trial. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients, n=20, were administered lidocaine 1%, 70 mg and levobupivacaine 5 mg, both locally; Group B patients, n= 20, were locally administered lidocaine 1%, 70 mg, levobupivacaine 5 mg, and dexmedetomidine at 3 μg/kg/dose. Sympathetic and peripheral blocks were made to each patient, according to the specific clinical picture and neuropathic pain localization. Pre-block-assessed parameters were again determined 1 and 5 minutes after finalizing the anesthetic procedure. Adverse events, either spontaneously reported or obtained through open questions, were also determined. Results: Tolerability assessment resulted in 42.5% of overall patients not reporting treatment-related adverse events, and again when comparing both groups, those receiving dexmedetomidine reported adverse events less frequently (50%) than Group A patients (35%). Conclusions: We conclude that, besides its sedative properties, dexmedetomidine together with local anesthetics showed excellent analgesia-enhancing effects, with the additional benefit of a favorable side-effect profile, lacking respiratory-depressant actions and improving overall patient management. In addition, patients receiving dexmedetomidine showed changes in heart rate and blood pressure that were both predictable and stable during and after the anesthetic procedures, while the patient achieved anxiolysis, improving his tolerance to the procedure itself 2004 artículo científico 0798-0264 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55923106 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=559 Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica application/pdf Sociedad Venezolana de Farmacología Clínica y Terapéutica Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica (República Bolivariana de Venezuela) Num.1 Vol.23
title Seguridad clínica de la Dexmedetomidina en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático
topic Medicina
Nerve block
Dexmedetomidine
Levobupivacaine
Neuropathic pain
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55923106