HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS PERPETRATED BY STATE AGENTS IN MILITARY OCCUPATIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INCURSION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO THE NORMATIVE TERRITORY OF THE ARMED CONFLICTS

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sidney Cesar Silva Guerra
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Centro Universitário Christus 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876431024846536704
author Sidney Cesar Silva Guerra
author_facet Sidney Cesar Silva Guerra
contents HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS PERPETRATED BY STATE AGENTS IN MILITARY OCCUPATIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INCURSION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO THE NORMATIVE TERRITORY OF THE ARMED CONFLICTS Sidney Cesar Silva Guerra Luz E. Nagle Ádria Saviano Fabricio da Silva Derecho Legal Antinomy Military Occupations Human Rights Violations International Human Rights Law International Humanitarian Law Objectives: This article aims to revisit the interrelationship between International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Human Rights Law (IHRL), in honour of their respective normative scopes and in order to carry out an analysis of their complementary or supplementary application, towards the construction of a more appropriate tool for the protection of human beings in extreme situations, as it occurs during armed conflicts. This is because, amid the multifaceted vulnerabilities that accumulate in today's conflicts, it is essential to provide the most effective source of protection - proportional to the demands for protection that are manifested today, particularly in military occupations around the world, whose occurrence will be the focus of this research. Methodology: As for the method of approach concerning the logical basis of the investigation, the hypothetical-deductive procedure method was selected, with a qualitative approach, and a bibliographic research and case analysis technique, insofar as the corroboration or falsification of the main hypothesis about the effective complementary and harmonious application of IHRL will be tested to cases of human rights violations in International Armed Conflicts in the military occupation modality. The exploratory aim was developed through the understanding of the Military Occupations as an ideal scenario to indicate the legal antinomies between IHRL and IHL. Results: In this investigation, specifically utilising the Military Occupations scenario, it was concluded that the most appropriate positions for the protection of the vulnerable should be substantially grounded on IHRL fundamentals regarding the still obscure area of transition between the two areas, aiming at the consolidation of a doctrinal understanding to base new consultative opinions in the future. Contributions: Given this framework, the core of this work lies in the understanding of the praxis for the complementary application of both aspects in armed conflicts, considering not only International Human Rights Law as lex generalis, but their effective overlap to the detriment of International Humanitarian Law, when it is most beneficial to human protection in the cases of Military Occupations. 2021 artículo científico 1806-0420 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=633875002002 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/633875002002.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/movil 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.p32-57.2021 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=6338 Revista Opinião Jurídica application/pdf Centro Universitário Christus Revista Opinião Jurídica (Brasil) Num.32 Vol.19
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_633875002002
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2021
publisher Centro Universitário Christus
spellingShingle HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS PERPETRATED BY STATE AGENTS IN MILITARY OCCUPATIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INCURSION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO THE NORMATIVE TERRITORY OF THE ARMED CONFLICTS
Sidney Cesar Silva Guerra
Derecho
Legal Antinomy
Military Occupations
Human Rights Violations
International Human Rights Law
International Humanitarian Law
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS PERPETRATED BY STATE AGENTS IN MILITARY OCCUPATIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INCURSION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO THE NORMATIVE TERRITORY OF THE ARMED CONFLICTS Sidney Cesar Silva Guerra Luz E. Nagle Ádria Saviano Fabricio da Silva Derecho Legal Antinomy Military Occupations Human Rights Violations International Human Rights Law International Humanitarian Law Objectives: This article aims to revisit the interrelationship between International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Human Rights Law (IHRL), in honour of their respective normative scopes and in order to carry out an analysis of their complementary or supplementary application, towards the construction of a more appropriate tool for the protection of human beings in extreme situations, as it occurs during armed conflicts. This is because, amid the multifaceted vulnerabilities that accumulate in today's conflicts, it is essential to provide the most effective source of protection - proportional to the demands for protection that are manifested today, particularly in military occupations around the world, whose occurrence will be the focus of this research. Methodology: As for the method of approach concerning the logical basis of the investigation, the hypothetical-deductive procedure method was selected, with a qualitative approach, and a bibliographic research and case analysis technique, insofar as the corroboration or falsification of the main hypothesis about the effective complementary and harmonious application of IHRL will be tested to cases of human rights violations in International Armed Conflicts in the military occupation modality. The exploratory aim was developed through the understanding of the Military Occupations as an ideal scenario to indicate the legal antinomies between IHRL and IHL. Results: In this investigation, specifically utilising the Military Occupations scenario, it was concluded that the most appropriate positions for the protection of the vulnerable should be substantially grounded on IHRL fundamentals regarding the still obscure area of transition between the two areas, aiming at the consolidation of a doctrinal understanding to base new consultative opinions in the future. Contributions: Given this framework, the core of this work lies in the understanding of the praxis for the complementary application of both aspects in armed conflicts, considering not only International Human Rights Law as lex generalis, but their effective overlap to the detriment of International Humanitarian Law, when it is most beneficial to human protection in the cases of Military Occupations. 2021 artículo científico 1806-0420 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=633875002002 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/633875002002.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/movil 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.p32-57.2021 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=6338 Revista Opinião Jurídica application/pdf Centro Universitário Christus Revista Opinião Jurídica (Brasil) Num.32 Vol.19
title HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS PERPETRATED BY STATE AGENTS IN MILITARY OCCUPATIONS: ANALYSIS OF THE INCURSION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO THE NORMATIVE TERRITORY OF THE ARMED CONFLICTS
topic Derecho
Legal Antinomy
Military Occupations
Human Rights Violations
International Human Rights Law
International Humanitarian Law
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=633875002002
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/633875002002.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6338/633875002002/movil