CONDITIONALS AND DISJUNCTIONS IN MENTAL-LOGIC THEORY: A RESPONSE TO LIU AND CHOU (2012) AND TO LÓPEZ ASTORGA (2013)

Fuente: Redalyc
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: David P. O’Brien
Natura: Artículo científico
Lingua:en
Pubblicazione: Universidad de Talca 2014
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1876483676725837824
author David P. O’Brien
author_facet David P. O’Brien
contents CONDITIONALS AND DISJUNCTIONS IN MENTAL-LOGIC THEORY: A RESPONSE TO LIU AND CHOU (2012) AND TO LÓPEZ ASTORGA (2013) David P. O’Brien Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales) Keywords reasoning Mental logic modus ponens disjunctions Liu and Chou (2012) presented a two-step theory to describe reasoning both on the four traditional conditional syllogisms and on four parallel syllogisms that replace the conditional with a disjunction. Th is article proposes that although Liu and Chou show that the words if and or play an important role in generating the data they report, their theory provides no explanation of how these words play any role. Th e article also corrects an assertion by López Astorga (2013) that mental-logic theory accounts for the fi ndings of Liu and Chou by interpreting if as the material conditional. Instead I show why mental-logic theory rejects the material conditional and accounts for the data using a procedural- semantics approach to the meaning of logic particles. Th e article concludes that a theory like that of Liu and Chou requires something like mental-logic theory to account for their data. 2014 artículo científico 0716-498X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=65032873015 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=650 Universum. Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales application/pdf Universidad de Talca Universum. Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (Chile) Num.2 Vol.29
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_65032873015
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2014
publisher Universidad de Talca
spellingShingle CONDITIONALS AND DISJUNCTIONS IN MENTAL-LOGIC THEORY: A RESPONSE TO LIU AND CHOU (2012) AND TO LÓPEZ ASTORGA (2013)
David P. O’Brien
Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales)
Keywords
reasoning
Mental logic
modus ponens
disjunctions
CONDITIONALS AND DISJUNCTIONS IN MENTAL-LOGIC THEORY: A RESPONSE TO LIU AND CHOU (2012) AND TO LÓPEZ ASTORGA (2013) David P. O’Brien Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales) Keywords reasoning Mental logic modus ponens disjunctions Liu and Chou (2012) presented a two-step theory to describe reasoning both on the four traditional conditional syllogisms and on four parallel syllogisms that replace the conditional with a disjunction. Th is article proposes that although Liu and Chou show that the words if and or play an important role in generating the data they report, their theory provides no explanation of how these words play any role. Th e article also corrects an assertion by López Astorga (2013) that mental-logic theory accounts for the fi ndings of Liu and Chou by interpreting if as the material conditional. Instead I show why mental-logic theory rejects the material conditional and accounts for the data using a procedural- semantics approach to the meaning of logic particles. Th e article concludes that a theory like that of Liu and Chou requires something like mental-logic theory to account for their data. 2014 artículo científico 0716-498X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=65032873015 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=650 Universum. Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales application/pdf Universidad de Talca Universum. Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (Chile) Num.2 Vol.29
title CONDITIONALS AND DISJUNCTIONS IN MENTAL-LOGIC THEORY: A RESPONSE TO LIU AND CHOU (2012) AND TO LÓPEZ ASTORGA (2013)
topic Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales)
Keywords
reasoning
Mental logic
modus ponens
disjunctions
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=65032873015