Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Universidade de São Paulo
2006
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67240152008 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866814386484543488 |
|---|---|
| author | Maria José Duarte Osis |
| author_facet | Maria José Duarte Osis |
| contents | Brazilian doctors’ perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section Maria José Duarte Osis José Guilherme Cecatti Karla Simônia de Pádua Anibal Faúndes Salud public section Delivery practice Hospital OBJECTIVE : To describe the opinion of doctors who participated in the Latin American Study on Cesarean section in Brazil regarding the second opinion strategy when faced with the decision of performing a C-section. METHODS : Seventy-two doctors from the hospitals where the study took place (where the second opinion was routinely sought) and 70 from the control group answered a pre-tested self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive tables were prepared based on the frequency of relevant variables on opinion of physicians regarding: effectiveness of the application of the second opinion strategy; on whether they would recommend implementation of this strategy and reasons for not recommending it in private institutions; feasibility of the strategy implementation and reasons for not considering this implementation feasible in private institutions. RESULTS : Half of the doctors from the intervention hospitals (50%) and about two thirds of those in the control group (65%) evaluated the second opinion as being or having the potential of being effective/very effective in their institutions. The great majority of those interviewed from both intervention and control hospitals considered this strategy feasible in public (87% and 95% respectively) but not in private hospitals (64% and 70% respectively), mainly because in the latter the doctors would not accept interference from a colleague in their decision-making process. CONCLUSION : Although the second opinion strategy was perceived as effective in reducing C-section rates, doctors did not regard it feasible outside the public health system in Brazil. 2006 artículo científico 0034-8910 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67240152008 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=672 Revista de Saúde Pública application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo Revista de Saúde Pública (Brasil) Num.2 Vol.40 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_67240152008 |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publisher | Universidade de São Paulo |
| spellingShingle | Brazilian doctors’ perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section Maria José Duarte Osis Salud public section Delivery practice Hospital Brazilian doctors’ perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section Maria José Duarte Osis José Guilherme Cecatti Karla Simônia de Pádua Anibal Faúndes Salud public section Delivery practice Hospital OBJECTIVE : To describe the opinion of doctors who participated in the Latin American Study on Cesarean section in Brazil regarding the second opinion strategy when faced with the decision of performing a C-section. METHODS : Seventy-two doctors from the hospitals where the study took place (where the second opinion was routinely sought) and 70 from the control group answered a pre-tested self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive tables were prepared based on the frequency of relevant variables on opinion of physicians regarding: effectiveness of the application of the second opinion strategy; on whether they would recommend implementation of this strategy and reasons for not recommending it in private institutions; feasibility of the strategy implementation and reasons for not considering this implementation feasible in private institutions. RESULTS : Half of the doctors from the intervention hospitals (50%) and about two thirds of those in the control group (65%) evaluated the second opinion as being or having the potential of being effective/very effective in their institutions. The great majority of those interviewed from both intervention and control hospitals considered this strategy feasible in public (87% and 95% respectively) but not in private hospitals (64% and 70% respectively), mainly because in the latter the doctors would not accept interference from a colleague in their decision-making process. CONCLUSION : Although the second opinion strategy was perceived as effective in reducing C-section rates, doctors did not regard it feasible outside the public health system in Brazil. 2006 artículo científico 0034-8910 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67240152008 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=672 Revista de Saúde Pública application/pdf Universidade de São Paulo Revista de Saúde Pública (Brasil) Num.2 Vol.40 |
| title | Brazilian doctors’ perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section |
| topic | Salud public section Delivery practice Hospital |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67240152008 |