Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Universität Bern
2018
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=677873366016 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
Sommario:
- Muscle tuning and preferred movement path: do we need a paradigm shift or should we redefine the old? – comment on Nigg et al. Benedicte Vanwanseele Xianyi Zhang Kurt Schütte Salud injury IImpact running pronation performance In the feature paper “Muscle tuning and preferred movement path – a paradigm shift“, Benno Nigg and colleagues discuss that the impact and pronation paradigm should be abandoned as there is not enough biomechanical and epidemiological evidence supporting these paradigms. We agree that the paradigms, as defined in the paper, are currently not supported by strong scientific evidence however we argue that the lack of evidence originates from shortcomings in the methodological ap- proach to these paradigms. In our commentary, we argue for a redefinition of the paradigms rather than defining two ‘new’ paradigms. A better methodological approach and definitions of the para- digms based on the current evidence are needed rather than to abandon them. 2018 artículo científico 2414-6641 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=677873366016 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=6778 Current Issues in Sport Science application/pdf Universität Bern Current Issues in Sport Science (Suiza) Vol.3