Beyond nature vs. nurture in expertise research – comment on Baker & Wattie

Fuente: Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: David Z. Hambrick
Format: Artículo científico
Langue:en
Publié: Universität Bern 2019
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1876422864191619072
author David Z. Hambrick
author_facet David Z. Hambrick
contents Beyond nature vs. nurture in expertise research – comment on Baker & Wattie David Z. Hambrick Alexander P. Burgoyne Salud Talent sports training expertise natural selection The field of expertise is mired in a nature vs. nurture debate. Despite what we now know from behavioral genetics research about the underpinnings of human behavior, some expertise theorists continue to deny or downplay the importance of genetic factors (“innate talent”) in expert performance. In this commentary, we argue that this viewpoint is neither defensible nor productive. Our argument is based on two observations. First, there are always limits on human performance, even among individuals who have engaged in long periods of intensive training. Second, grounded in a neurobiological system that has evolved through natural selection, variation across people in phenotypes reflecting these limits will have a genetic component. We comment on directions for future research to advance the field of expertise. 2019 artículo científico 2414-6641 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=677873369012 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=6778 Current Issues in Sport Science application/pdf Universität Bern Current Issues in Sport Science (Suiza) Vol.4
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_677873369012
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2019
publisher Universität Bern
spellingShingle Beyond nature vs. nurture in expertise research – comment on Baker & Wattie
David Z. Hambrick
Salud
Talent
sports
training
expertise
natural selection
Beyond nature vs. nurture in expertise research – comment on Baker & Wattie David Z. Hambrick Alexander P. Burgoyne Salud Talent sports training expertise natural selection The field of expertise is mired in a nature vs. nurture debate. Despite what we now know from behavioral genetics research about the underpinnings of human behavior, some expertise theorists continue to deny or downplay the importance of genetic factors (“innate talent”) in expert performance. In this commentary, we argue that this viewpoint is neither defensible nor productive. Our argument is based on two observations. First, there are always limits on human performance, even among individuals who have engaged in long periods of intensive training. Second, grounded in a neurobiological system that has evolved through natural selection, variation across people in phenotypes reflecting these limits will have a genetic component. We comment on directions for future research to advance the field of expertise. 2019 artículo científico 2414-6641 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=677873369012 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=6778 Current Issues in Sport Science application/pdf Universität Bern Current Issues in Sport Science (Suiza) Vol.4
title Beyond nature vs. nurture in expertise research – comment on Baker & Wattie
topic Salud
Talent
sports
training
expertise
natural selection
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=677873369012