Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Machelle DAVISON
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876468982610919424
author Machelle DAVISON
author_facet Machelle DAVISON
contents Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development Machelle DAVISON Melissa S. MEDINA Nancy E. RAY Medicina pharmacy graduate Education internship nonmedical Objectives: New guidelines require preceptors to deliver approximately 30% of the doctor of pharmacy curricula. With preceptor's increasing responsibilities, colleges are faced with the task of training preceptors as educators. Identifying preceptor's training format preferences (i.e. lectronic vs. live) should contribute to the more effective and efficient creation of training materials and programs. Methods: A preceptor training video was created and made available electronically and was distributed to 400 preceptors with a brief 2-part questionnaire about preceptor training preferences, electronic training preferences after viewing the video, and available technology resources for participating in electronic training. Results: 38.25% of the questionnaires were returned. The majority of respondents (57%)preferred electronic to live preceptor developing training and the majority (53%) had not previously attended the live annual preceptor development conference offered by the college. 51.6% participants reviewed the electronic training video created by the OU College of Pharmacy. Of the respondents who did not watch the video, 73% cited having too little time, problems accessing the video, or technical reasons for not watching the training video. The majority of responders in all age groups preferred electronic training to face-to-face training except those ages 61-65 and the majority (55.7%) would participate in on-line training again in the future. The majority of respondents have the technical resources to participate in electronic training. Conclusion: Preceptors have limited time to participate in preceptor development training, although they view training as an important activity. This study reveals three main findings: (1) the majority of preceptors prefer electronic preceptor development training programs regardless of age; (2) would participate in future electronic training after having participated in electronic training; and (3) have the available resources to participate in electronic training. Future preceptor development programs should have flexible formats to accommodate preferences for live and electronic programming. 2009 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69011143007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/69011143007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.1 Vol.7
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_69011143007
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2009
publisher Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas
spellingShingle Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
Machelle DAVISON
Medicina
pharmacy
graduate
Education
internship
nonmedical
Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development Machelle DAVISON Melissa S. MEDINA Nancy E. RAY Medicina pharmacy graduate Education internship nonmedical Objectives: New guidelines require preceptors to deliver approximately 30% of the doctor of pharmacy curricula. With preceptor's increasing responsibilities, colleges are faced with the task of training preceptors as educators. Identifying preceptor's training format preferences (i.e. lectronic vs. live) should contribute to the more effective and efficient creation of training materials and programs. Methods: A preceptor training video was created and made available electronically and was distributed to 400 preceptors with a brief 2-part questionnaire about preceptor training preferences, electronic training preferences after viewing the video, and available technology resources for participating in electronic training. Results: 38.25% of the questionnaires were returned. The majority of respondents (57%)preferred electronic to live preceptor developing training and the majority (53%) had not previously attended the live annual preceptor development conference offered by the college. 51.6% participants reviewed the electronic training video created by the OU College of Pharmacy. Of the respondents who did not watch the video, 73% cited having too little time, problems accessing the video, or technical reasons for not watching the training video. The majority of responders in all age groups preferred electronic training to face-to-face training except those ages 61-65 and the majority (55.7%) would participate in on-line training again in the future. The majority of respondents have the technical resources to participate in electronic training. Conclusion: Preceptors have limited time to participate in preceptor development training, although they view training as an important activity. This study reveals three main findings: (1) the majority of preceptors prefer electronic preceptor development training programs regardless of age; (2) would participate in future electronic training after having participated in electronic training; and (3) have the available resources to participate in electronic training. Future preceptor development programs should have flexible formats to accommodate preferences for live and electronic programming. 2009 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69011143007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/69011143007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.1 Vol.7
title Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
topic Medicina
pharmacy
graduate
Education
internship
nonmedical
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69011143007
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/69011143007.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011143007/movil