Cost of outpatient hypertension pharmacotherapy: comparative study between Bulgaria and Serbia

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Anna IVANOVA
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876424603914469376
author Anna IVANOVA
author_facet Anna IVANOVA
contents Cost of outpatient hypertension pharmacotherapy: comparative study between Bulgaria and Serbia Anna IVANOVA Dragana LAKIC Vesna ANDRIC Guenka PETROVA Medicina Serbia Bulgaria drug costs Hypertension health expenditures Objective: To compare the prescribing practice and pharmacotherapy outpatient cost of hypertension and its common complications between two neighboring countries, Bulgaria and Serbia. The study questions focus on consistency of the prescribing practice with the treatment guidelines; comparability of the treatment patterns among both countries, and burden of hypertension cost to the population and third party payer in the countries under consideration. Methods: Retrospective study, one year time horizon is for outpatient therapy. Results: Patients with arterial hypertension in Bulgaria are most often on monotherapy (61% vs 6% in Serbia), as well as those with complications (66% vs 0% Serbia). In both countries the first choice of therapy are the ACE inhibitors (37.01% in Serbia and 41% in Bulgaria) and then follows the calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, and diuretics. The weighed monthly cost of hypertension and complicated hypertension is almost doubled in Serbia (12.56 vs 8.23 EUR for hypertension, and 13.39 vs 8.23 EUR) and prevailing part is reimbursed (88% vs 44% in Bulgaria). Conclusion: Our study confirms that hypertension and its complications therapy consumes a huge amount of financial resources. In both countries under consideration the therapy is corresponding with the European treatment guidelines. The international cost comparisons are possible but they depend on many external factors as the regulatory measures, prescribing habits and reimbursement policy and should be analysed within this framework. 2009 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69011697007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/69011697007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.2 Vol.7
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_69011697007
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2009
publisher Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas
spellingShingle Cost of outpatient hypertension pharmacotherapy: comparative study between Bulgaria and Serbia
Anna IVANOVA
Medicina
Serbia
Bulgaria
drug costs
Hypertension
health expenditures
Cost of outpatient hypertension pharmacotherapy: comparative study between Bulgaria and Serbia Anna IVANOVA Dragana LAKIC Vesna ANDRIC Guenka PETROVA Medicina Serbia Bulgaria drug costs Hypertension health expenditures Objective: To compare the prescribing practice and pharmacotherapy outpatient cost of hypertension and its common complications between two neighboring countries, Bulgaria and Serbia. The study questions focus on consistency of the prescribing practice with the treatment guidelines; comparability of the treatment patterns among both countries, and burden of hypertension cost to the population and third party payer in the countries under consideration. Methods: Retrospective study, one year time horizon is for outpatient therapy. Results: Patients with arterial hypertension in Bulgaria are most often on monotherapy (61% vs 6% in Serbia), as well as those with complications (66% vs 0% Serbia). In both countries the first choice of therapy are the ACE inhibitors (37.01% in Serbia and 41% in Bulgaria) and then follows the calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, and diuretics. The weighed monthly cost of hypertension and complicated hypertension is almost doubled in Serbia (12.56 vs 8.23 EUR for hypertension, and 13.39 vs 8.23 EUR) and prevailing part is reimbursed (88% vs 44% in Bulgaria). Conclusion: Our study confirms that hypertension and its complications therapy consumes a huge amount of financial resources. In both countries under consideration the therapy is corresponding with the European treatment guidelines. The international cost comparisons are possible but they depend on many external factors as the regulatory measures, prescribing habits and reimbursement policy and should be analysed within this framework. 2009 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69011697007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/69011697007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.2 Vol.7
title Cost of outpatient hypertension pharmacotherapy: comparative study between Bulgaria and Serbia
topic Medicina
Serbia
Bulgaria
drug costs
Hypertension
health expenditures
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69011697007
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/69011697007.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69011697007/movil