Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice
Fuente:
Redalyc
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas
2016
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1876469115862908928 |
|---|---|
| author | Antonio E. MENDES |
| author_facet | Antonio E. MENDES |
| contents | Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice Antonio E. MENDES Fernanda S. TONIN Fernando FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS Medicina Authorship Publishing Pharmacists Bibliometrics Periodicals as Topic Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns and trends in the editorial process and features of the first decade of Pharmacy Practice, with the final goal of initiating a benchmarking process to enhance the quality of the journal. Methods: Metadata of all of the articles published from 2006 issue #3 to 2016 issue #2 were extracted from PubMed and complemented by a manual data extraction process on the full-text articles. Citations of these articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar on August 15, 2016. The references from all of the articles published by Pharmacy Practice in 2015 were also extracted. International collaboration was explored with a network analysis. Results: A total of 40 issues were published in this timespan, including 349 articles, 91.1% of which were original research articles. The number of citations received by these articles varies from 809, as reported by the WOS, to the 1162 reported by Scopus and the 2610 reported by Google Scholar. The journals cited by Pharmacy Practice are mainly pharmacy journals, including Pharm Pract (Granada), Int J Clin Pharm, Am J Health-Syst Pharm, Am J Pharm Educ, and Ann Pharmacother. Only 17.3% of the articles involved international collaboration. Delays in the editorial process increased in 2013, mainly due to an increase in acceptance delay (mean=138 days). Conclusion: Pharmacy Practice has improved its visibility and impact over the past decade, especially after 2014, when the journal became indexed in PubMed Central. The editorial process duration is one of the weaknesses that should be tackled. Further studies should investigate if the low international collaboration rate is common across other pharmacy journals. 2016 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69049099009 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.4 Vol.14 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_69049099009 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas |
| spellingShingle | Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice Antonio E. MENDES Medicina Authorship Publishing Pharmacists Bibliometrics Periodicals as Topic Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice Antonio E. MENDES Fernanda S. TONIN Fernando FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS Medicina Authorship Publishing Pharmacists Bibliometrics Periodicals as Topic Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns and trends in the editorial process and features of the first decade of Pharmacy Practice, with the final goal of initiating a benchmarking process to enhance the quality of the journal. Methods: Metadata of all of the articles published from 2006 issue #3 to 2016 issue #2 were extracted from PubMed and complemented by a manual data extraction process on the full-text articles. Citations of these articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar on August 15, 2016. The references from all of the articles published by Pharmacy Practice in 2015 were also extracted. International collaboration was explored with a network analysis. Results: A total of 40 issues were published in this timespan, including 349 articles, 91.1% of which were original research articles. The number of citations received by these articles varies from 809, as reported by the WOS, to the 1162 reported by Scopus and the 2610 reported by Google Scholar. The journals cited by Pharmacy Practice are mainly pharmacy journals, including Pharm Pract (Granada), Int J Clin Pharm, Am J Health-Syst Pharm, Am J Pharm Educ, and Ann Pharmacother. Only 17.3% of the articles involved international collaboration. Delays in the editorial process increased in 2013, mainly due to an increase in acceptance delay (mean=138 days). Conclusion: Pharmacy Practice has improved its visibility and impact over the past decade, especially after 2014, when the journal became indexed in PubMed Central. The editorial process duration is one of the weaknesses that should be tackled. Further studies should investigate if the low international collaboration rate is common across other pharmacy journals. 2016 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69049099009 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.4 Vol.14 |
| title | Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice |
| topic | Medicina Authorship Publishing Pharmacists Bibliometrics Periodicals as Topic |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69049099009 |