Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69050402 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/69050402.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/movil |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866567431361658880 |
|---|---|
| author | Craig I. Coleman |
| author_facet | Craig I. Coleman |
| contents | Journal publications by pharmacy practice faculty evaluated by titution and region of the United States (2001-2003) Craig I. Coleman Lauren Schlesselmann C. Michael White Medicina Faculty Bibliometrics United States Pharmacy Schools Objective: To compare the quantity of manuscriptspublished in journals by departments of pharmacypractice at schools and colleges of pharmacy in theUnited States for the years 2001-2003.Methods: We utilized the Web of Sciencebibliographic database to identify publicationcitations for the years 2001 to 2003 which were thenevaluated in a number of different ways. Facultywere identified via American Association ofColleges of Pharmacy rosters for 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003 academic years.Results: Rankings were done based on the numberof publications per institution and average numberof publications per faculty member at an institution.Upon linear regression analysis, a relationshipexists between an institutions faculty size and thetotal number of publications but not fortenure/nontenure-track faculty ratio. Rating highestin overall publication number did not guarantee highrankings in the average number of publications perfaculty member at an institution assessment.Midwestern schools were responsible for morepublications per institution than other regions. Manyschools only generated minimal scholarship overthis evaluative period.Conclusion: While many schools have pharmacypractice faculty that strongly contributed to thebiomedical literature, other schools have not.Pharmacy practice faculty in the Midwest publishmore journal manuscripts than faculty in otherregions of the country. More pharmacy schoolsneed to engage their faculty in scholarly endeavorsby providing support and incentives. 2007 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69050402 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/69050402.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.4 Vol.5 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_69050402 |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publisher | Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas |
| spellingShingle | Journal publications by pharmacy practice faculty evaluated by titution and region of the United States (2001-2003) Craig I. Coleman Medicina Faculty Bibliometrics United States Pharmacy Schools Journal publications by pharmacy practice faculty evaluated by titution and region of the United States (2001-2003) Craig I. Coleman Lauren Schlesselmann C. Michael White Medicina Faculty Bibliometrics United States Pharmacy Schools Objective: To compare the quantity of manuscriptspublished in journals by departments of pharmacypractice at schools and colleges of pharmacy in theUnited States for the years 2001-2003.Methods: We utilized the Web of Sciencebibliographic database to identify publicationcitations for the years 2001 to 2003 which were thenevaluated in a number of different ways. Facultywere identified via American Association ofColleges of Pharmacy rosters for 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003 academic years.Results: Rankings were done based on the numberof publications per institution and average numberof publications per faculty member at an institution.Upon linear regression analysis, a relationshipexists between an institutions faculty size and thetotal number of publications but not fortenure/nontenure-track faculty ratio. Rating highestin overall publication number did not guarantee highrankings in the average number of publications perfaculty member at an institution assessment.Midwestern schools were responsible for morepublications per institution than other regions. Manyschools only generated minimal scholarship overthis evaluative period.Conclusion: While many schools have pharmacypractice faculty that strongly contributed to thebiomedical literature, other schools have not.Pharmacy practice faculty in the Midwest publishmore journal manuscripts than faculty in otherregions of the country. More pharmacy schoolsneed to engage their faculty in scholarly endeavorsby providing support and incentives. 2007 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69050402 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/69050402.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/movil en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.4 Vol.5 |
| title | Journal publications by pharmacy practice faculty evaluated by titution and region of the United States (2001-2003) |
| topic | Medicina Faculty Bibliometrics United States Pharmacy Schools |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69050402 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/69050402.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69050402/movil |