Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and safe prescribing: an assessment of medical staff knowledge and behaviour

Fuente: Redalyc
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mona Mostaghim
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1876428230219530240
author Mona Mostaghim
author_facet Mona Mostaghim
contents Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and safe prescribing: an assessment of medical staff knowledge and behaviour Mona Mostaghim Tom Snelling Hala Katf Beata Bajorek Medicina Practice Attitudes Australia Pediatrics Health Knowledge Objective: Determine baseline knowledge of antimicrobial stewardship, and safe prescribing among junior medical officers, monitor their level of participation in interactive education during protected teaching time and assess day-to-day prescribing behaviours over the subsequent 3-month period. Methods: A voluntary and anonymous survey of all non-consultant level medical officers was conducted with the use of an audience response system during mandatory face-to-face orientation sessions at a tertiary paediatric hospital. Routine prescribing audits monitored compliance with national and locally derived quality use of medicines indicators. Results: Eighty-six percent of medical officers participated by responding to at least one question (171/200). Response rate for individual questions ranged between 31% and 78%. Questions that addressed adverse drug reactions, documentation and monitoring for empiric antibiotics and the error-prone abbreviations IU and U were correctly answered by over 90% of participants. Other nonstandard and error-prone abbreviations were less consistently identified. In practice, 68% of patients had complete adverse drug reaction documentation (113/166). Error-prone abbreviations were identified on 5% of audited medication orders (47/976), approximately half included a documented indication and intended dose. Conclusions: Participants demonstrated a good understanding of safe prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship. Audits of prescribing identified potential discrepancies between prescribing knowledge and behaviours. 2018 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69061110012 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/69061110012.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/movil 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.02.1198 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.2 Vol.16
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_69061110012
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2018
publisher Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas
spellingShingle Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and safe prescribing: an assessment of medical staff knowledge and behaviour
Mona Mostaghim
Medicina
Practice
Attitudes
Australia
Pediatrics
Health Knowledge
Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and safe prescribing: an assessment of medical staff knowledge and behaviour Mona Mostaghim Tom Snelling Hala Katf Beata Bajorek Medicina Practice Attitudes Australia Pediatrics Health Knowledge Objective: Determine baseline knowledge of antimicrobial stewardship, and safe prescribing among junior medical officers, monitor their level of participation in interactive education during protected teaching time and assess day-to-day prescribing behaviours over the subsequent 3-month period. Methods: A voluntary and anonymous survey of all non-consultant level medical officers was conducted with the use of an audience response system during mandatory face-to-face orientation sessions at a tertiary paediatric hospital. Routine prescribing audits monitored compliance with national and locally derived quality use of medicines indicators. Results: Eighty-six percent of medical officers participated by responding to at least one question (171/200). Response rate for individual questions ranged between 31% and 78%. Questions that addressed adverse drug reactions, documentation and monitoring for empiric antibiotics and the error-prone abbreviations IU and U were correctly answered by over 90% of participants. Other nonstandard and error-prone abbreviations were less consistently identified. In practice, 68% of patients had complete adverse drug reaction documentation (113/166). Error-prone abbreviations were identified on 5% of audited medication orders (47/976), approximately half included a documented indication and intended dose. Conclusions: Participants demonstrated a good understanding of safe prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship. Audits of prescribing identified potential discrepancies between prescribing knowledge and behaviours. 2018 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69061110012 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/69061110012.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/movil 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.02.1198 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.2 Vol.16
title Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and safe prescribing: an assessment of medical staff knowledge and behaviour
topic Medicina
Practice
Attitudes
Australia
Pediatrics
Health Knowledge
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69061110012
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/69061110012.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69061110012/movil