Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69065537013 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/69065537013.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/movil |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Inpatient prescribing of dual antiplatelet therapy according to the guidelines: a prospective intervention study Ashwin R. Moerlie Renate C. Van Uden Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse Patricia Van Den Bemt Matthijs L. Becker Medicina Hemorrhage Pharmacists Netherlands Risk Factors Clinical Audit Background: In dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), low-dose acetylsalicylic acid is combined with a P2Y12 inhibitor. However, combining antithrombotic agents increases the risk of bleeding. Guidelines on DAPT recommend using this combination for a limited period of between three weeks and 30 months. This implies the risk of DAPT being erroneously continued after the intended stop date.Objective: The primary objective of this study is to assess the proportion of hospitalized patients treated with DAPT whose treatment deviated erroneously and unintentionally from the guidelines. We also assessed risk factors and the effect of a pharmacist intervention.Methods: All patients admitted to the Spaarne Gasthuis (Haarlem/ Hoofddorp, the Netherlands) who used DAPT between March 25 th, 2019, and June 14 th, 2019, were, in addition to receiving regular care, reviewed to assess whether their therapy was in line with the guidelines’ recommendation and whether deviations were unintended and erroneous. In the event of an unintended deviation, the pharmacist intervened by contacting the prescriber by phone and giving advice to adjust the antithrombotic therapy in line with the guideline. Results: We included 411 patients, of whom 21 patients (5.1%) had a treatment that deviated from the guidelines. For 11 patients (2.7%), the deviation was unintended and erroneous. The major risk factor for erroneous deviation was the use of DAPT before hospital admission (OR 18.7; 95%CI 4.79–72.7). In patients who used DAPT before admission, 18 out of 58 (31.0%) had a deviation from the guidelines of whom 8 (13.8%) were erroneous. For these eight patients, the pharmacist contacted the prescriber, and in these cases the therapy was adjusted in line with the guidelines.Conclusions: Adherence to the guidelines recommending DAPT was high within the hospital. However, patients who used DAPT before hospital admission had a higher risk of erroneous prescription of DAPT. Intervention by a pharmacist increased adherence to guidelines and may reduce the number of preventable bleeding cases. 2020 artículo científico 1885-642X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69065537013 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/69065537013.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/690/69065537013/movil 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.2.1803 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=690 Pharmacy Practice application/pdf Centro de investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmacéuticas Pharmacy Practice (España) Num.2 Vol.18