Effect of the inclusion of additives on the quality of sugarcane silage

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José Reyes-Gutiérrez
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad de Córdoba 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876449729785626624
author José Reyes-Gutiérrez
author_facet José Reyes-Gutiérrez
contents Effect of the inclusion of additives on the quality of sugarcane silage José Reyes-Gutiérrez Oziel Montañez-Valdez Cándido Guerra-Medina Alejandro Ley De Coss Veterinaria Silage forage fermentation Objective. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of an additive and an inoculum bacterial in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility dry matter (IVDMD) and organic matter (IVOMD) of sugarcane silage. Materials and methods. Experimental treatments were: a) sugarcane silage with 1% of bacterial inoculum and 1% of additive (SCS1); b) sugarcane silage with the bacterial inoculum 3% and 1% of additive (SCS3). The bacterial inoculum consists of 10.0% molasses, 1.0% of commercial yogurt containing Lactobacillus plantarum, L. bulgaricus, L. casei, L. acidophilus and L. bifidus, 5.0% poultry manure, 0.5% urea and 83.0% of water; the additive is formulated with 1.0% urea, 0.1% sulfate of ammonium and 0.25% phosphorus. Each treatment was determined to its chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of dry and organic matter and the results obtained were analyzed using T Student test. Results. There were differences between treatments (p<0.05) in crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, hemicellulose, ammoniacal nitrogen and pH, as well as on IVDMD, but without changes in the IVOMD, presenting the better values for SCS1. Conclusions. The 1% concentration of bacterial inoculum and additive added to sugarcane silage showed better values on in vitro digestibility of dry matter, and chemical composition, indicating an adequacy fermentation, but, at concentrations higher than 1% of additive and an inoculum bacterial decreases the quality and digestibility of the silage. 2018 otro 0122-0268 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69356053015 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/69356053015.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/movil https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1358 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=693 Revista MVZ Córdoba application/pdf Universidad de Córdoba Revista MVZ Córdoba (Colombia) Num.2 Vol.23
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_69356053015
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2018
publisher Universidad de Córdoba
spellingShingle Effect of the inclusion of additives on the quality of sugarcane silage
José Reyes-Gutiérrez
Veterinaria
Silage
forage
fermentation
Effect of the inclusion of additives on the quality of sugarcane silage José Reyes-Gutiérrez Oziel Montañez-Valdez Cándido Guerra-Medina Alejandro Ley De Coss Veterinaria Silage forage fermentation Objective. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of an additive and an inoculum bacterial in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility dry matter (IVDMD) and organic matter (IVOMD) of sugarcane silage. Materials and methods. Experimental treatments were: a) sugarcane silage with 1% of bacterial inoculum and 1% of additive (SCS1); b) sugarcane silage with the bacterial inoculum 3% and 1% of additive (SCS3). The bacterial inoculum consists of 10.0% molasses, 1.0% of commercial yogurt containing Lactobacillus plantarum, L. bulgaricus, L. casei, L. acidophilus and L. bifidus, 5.0% poultry manure, 0.5% urea and 83.0% of water; the additive is formulated with 1.0% urea, 0.1% sulfate of ammonium and 0.25% phosphorus. Each treatment was determined to its chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of dry and organic matter and the results obtained were analyzed using T Student test. Results. There were differences between treatments (p<0.05) in crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, hemicellulose, ammoniacal nitrogen and pH, as well as on IVDMD, but without changes in the IVOMD, presenting the better values for SCS1. Conclusions. The 1% concentration of bacterial inoculum and additive added to sugarcane silage showed better values on in vitro digestibility of dry matter, and chemical composition, indicating an adequacy fermentation, but, at concentrations higher than 1% of additive and an inoculum bacterial decreases the quality and digestibility of the silage. 2018 otro 0122-0268 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69356053015 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/69356053015.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/movil https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1358 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=693 Revista MVZ Córdoba application/pdf Universidad de Córdoba Revista MVZ Córdoba (Colombia) Num.2 Vol.23
title Effect of the inclusion of additives on the quality of sugarcane silage
topic Veterinaria
Silage
forage
fermentation
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69356053015
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/html/
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/69356053015.epub
https://www.redalyc.org/journal/693/69356053015/movil
https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1358