Cross-validation of 20 anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass in older Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia 2022
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876471284421885952
author Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla
author_facet Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla
contents Cross-validation of 20 anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass in older Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla Lucimere Bohn André Pereira dos Santos Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior Ana Claudia Rossini Venturini Nilo César Ramos Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo Jorge Mota Dalmo Roberto Lopes Machado Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas) sarcopenia Anthropometry body composition geriatric assessment Objective: To test the cross-validation of anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass (AMM) in older Brazilian women. Methods: Sixty-seven older women (69.84 ± 5.95 years old) underwent anthropometric measurements. AMM (kg) reference values obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (AMMDXA) were compared to 20 anthropometric equations for estimating AMM in older adults. A paired t-test (p > 0.05), standard error of estimate (SEE < 3.50 kg), and r2 > 0.70 confirmed the validity of the equations. The agreement between predictions and the reference was also verified (Bland-Altman analysis of agreement between methods). Results: Four American equations and one Mexican equation were not statistically different from AMMDXA (p > 0.05) but did not present suitable r2 values for validation. The American equation from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), AMM (kg) = (-0.04 × age [years]) + (0.46 × calf circumference [cm]) + (0.32 × arm circumference [cm]) + (0.11 × thigh circumference [cm]) – (0.27 × body mass index [BMI, kg/m2 ]) + (0.07 × waist circumference [cm]) – 13 119 showed the best performance (r2 = 0.64; SEE = 3.24 kg), with minimal mean difference (0.26 kg), no heteroscedasticity for extreme values, and with high agreement with the Brazilian sample (-3.90 to 3.40 kg). Conclusion: When specific equations for a given population are not available, the use of generic equations of greater sample representativeness with scientifically and reliably analyzed data is allowed. 2022 otro 2447-2115 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=739780783030 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=7397 Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging application/pdf Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.16
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_739780783030
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
spellingShingle Cross-validation of 20 anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass in older Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study
Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla
Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas)
sarcopenia
Anthropometry
body composition
geriatric assessment
Cross-validation of 20 anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass in older Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla Lucimere Bohn André Pereira dos Santos Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior Ana Claudia Rossini Venturini Nilo César Ramos Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo Jorge Mota Dalmo Roberto Lopes Machado Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas) sarcopenia Anthropometry body composition geriatric assessment Objective: To test the cross-validation of anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass (AMM) in older Brazilian women. Methods: Sixty-seven older women (69.84 ± 5.95 years old) underwent anthropometric measurements. AMM (kg) reference values obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (AMMDXA) were compared to 20 anthropometric equations for estimating AMM in older adults. A paired t-test (p > 0.05), standard error of estimate (SEE < 3.50 kg), and r2 > 0.70 confirmed the validity of the equations. The agreement between predictions and the reference was also verified (Bland-Altman analysis of agreement between methods). Results: Four American equations and one Mexican equation were not statistically different from AMMDXA (p > 0.05) but did not present suitable r2 values for validation. The American equation from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), AMM (kg) = (-0.04 × age [years]) + (0.46 × calf circumference [cm]) + (0.32 × arm circumference [cm]) + (0.11 × thigh circumference [cm]) – (0.27 × body mass index [BMI, kg/m2 ]) + (0.07 × waist circumference [cm]) – 13 119 showed the best performance (r2 = 0.64; SEE = 3.24 kg), with minimal mean difference (0.26 kg), no heteroscedasticity for extreme values, and with high agreement with the Brazilian sample (-3.90 to 3.40 kg). Conclusion: When specific equations for a given population are not available, the use of generic equations of greater sample representativeness with scientifically and reliably analyzed data is allowed. 2022 otro 2447-2115 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=739780783030 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=7397 Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging application/pdf Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Brasil) Num.1 Vol.16
title Cross-validation of 20 anthropometric prediction equations for appendicular muscle mass in older Brazilian women: a cross-sectional study
topic Multidisciplinaria (Ciencias Naturales y Exactas)
sarcopenia
Anthropometry
body composition
geriatric assessment
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=739780783030