The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2013
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876435187896680448 |
|---|---|
| author | Cristian Dimitriu |
| author_facet | Cristian Dimitriu |
| contents | The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense Cristian Dimitriu Filosofía Kant Herman O’Neill Korsgaard categorical imperative The article compares two different interpretations of Kant’s categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Given that neither of them rejects maxims of coordination/timing (they are similar in that sense) and only the practical interpretation rejects free riding, the logical interpretation should be rejected. 2013 artículo científico 0120-0062 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80928827005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=809 Ideas y Valores application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Ideas y Valores (Colombia) Num.151 Vol.LXII |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_80928827005 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| spellingShingle | The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense Cristian Dimitriu Filosofía Kant Herman O’Neill Korsgaard categorical imperative The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense Cristian Dimitriu Filosofía Kant Herman O’Neill Korsgaard categorical imperative The article compares two different interpretations of Kant’s categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Given that neither of them rejects maxims of coordination/timing (they are similar in that sense) and only the practical interpretation rejects free riding, the logical interpretation should be rejected. 2013 artículo científico 0120-0062 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80928827005 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=809 Ideas y Valores application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Ideas y Valores (Colombia) Num.151 Vol.LXII |
| title | The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense |
| topic | Filosofía Kant Herman O’Neill Korsgaard categorical imperative |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80928827005 |